Jilllian
Verified Insider - Jennifer Ramsaran Case
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2012
- Messages
- 1,062
- Reaction score
- 589
Sorry. But you're kind of making up things as you go along and throwing yourself completely off track.
Your comment of "Hell, as controlling as he was" is way off. Controlling men do not live next door to inlaws. And you are basing "controlling" from rumors. It is not factual information.
Of course he knew about tracking the phone. And your comment of a day and a half transpired is also incorrect.
<MOD SNIP>
The official time of Jennifer's missing was reported via 9-1-1 by her husband to the PD on the phone. Her father didn't want GR to phone 9-1-1. He didn't want police involved. He wanted to wait it out for her to come home. Because she was not answering text messages or phone calls during the day...GR was getting desperate and worried.
Finally, GR decided he didn't care what his father in law wanted...he was calling. He phoned 9-1-1 at 8pm. The pinging of the phone would not locate the device. It was in the morning, less than 12 hours later the pinging finally traced to the phone.
So let me get this straight.
Not only is a billboard "too costly" for GR, but now he's throwing his father-in-law under the bus? Really? From what I understand, her parents were in AZ at the time their daughter went missing. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
GR was getting "desperate and worried" "because she was not answering text messages or phone calls during the day"? I thought he (during the day) was working, took a run, then went to the sauna, chatted up an old state trooper friend, and then ran back home? Doesn't sound desperate or worried to me.
As you portray this scenario, it sounds like GR believed criminal activity took place. So why on Earth would he go alone to retrieve her phone in a very rural area, without calling the police first? If there was any threat of criminal activity, why would he go alone, take pictures, and only then notify LE?
I'm not buying any of it, <Mod Snip>