I now firmly believe the things my inside source has been telling me about this investigation:
the homicide squad has absolutely no clue who the LISK is.
the squad does not believe CPH is the LISK.
the current SCPD detectives aren't very good, and aren't as good as they have been historically.
Since the start of this case, unbiased rigorous analysis has concluded for me that one SK is responsible. The same analysis draws me to the conclusion that SG is related to this case, and that CPH is the LISK.
I couldn't agree with you more!
I just saw the update on the news, and I'm really irritated with the SCPD.
1) No (blip) Sherlock, it was one killer! Okay, strange things happen in this world, but really...what is the likelihood that several SK's are going to be operating and dumping bodies in the same place? It's not impossible, but not likely. I wonder - do they just say these things to throw people off for awhile while they investigate? Because I always thought that was downright stupid.
2) Bull_ that SG's disappearance is not connected. I say BS! (sorry for my choice of words in this post! I'm just really angry about all this!) I have to wonder again - do they really think this, or are they trying to throw people off for awhile? It is just WAY TOO COINCIDENTAL. And I'm sorry, I don't believe that coincidences of that magnitude happen very often, if at all.
Dormer says (with regard to SG's disappearance and his belief that it is not connected to the SK) "the MO is completely different, the scenario is completely different." Well, of course it would be different if there was no original intention of killing SG! The only thing that the "different MO" and "different scenario" might eliminate is the possibility that she was targeted from the beginning as a victim, that she was brought there with the intention of victimizing her. Is it not highly possible that the SK didn't intend for her to be a victim, but something happened while she was there that "necessitated" a change in plan e.g perhaps she saw or discovered something that made her flip out, and that her flip-out "necessitated" silencing her? How can they talk about MO and scenarios being "different" when what went down that night was obviously not planned, and was so bizarre?
It feels like they have no idea what they are doing. Can't they bring someone else in to work on this case, someone with some brains? I'm glad it's at least back in the news, but they HAVE to get this guy and resolve this, and I'm getting fed up. And I want them to find out what happened to poor Shannen once and for all. Maybe they are afraid of liability, after hanging her out to dry that night and thereafter.
I