Born2succeed
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2013
- Messages
- 122
- Reaction score
- 1
While I respect everyone's individual theories on what might have happened to RM, sometimes I "just don't get it". I'm not of the mind that he waltzed off into the sunset :bicycle:
I sure hope you all are on the right track, as I think that would have the best outcome for RM.
I have followed along + read most of the links that folks use to support their theories. Some of it has me :waitasec: At one point there was a link + quote which said something to the effect of (my words + questionable memory here) - 'of all missing person cases only 5% turn out to have left voluntarily'. Then there was a link that indicated - 'many of these cases are simply people who wanted to disappear'.
Now you can't have it both ways in my little brain. Many is not 5% to me.
Why does the majority here lean this way? I know all of your explanations of certain details + why you "feel" this is the case. I've seen the same in other cases as well + just never understood it.
http://www.longislandpress.com/2013/08/31/vanished-dix-hills-father-still-missing-after-2-months/
BBM - To me this means they have no evidence YET. Maybe there was no crime + they will never have evidence. Maybe there was + down the road some little thing will come up + they will change their stance. I think - JMO again - LE might suspect many things but they can't say what, until or unless they have hard evidence to back it up.
Or maybe.... they suspect the same thing and that is why the lack of interest! I have heard Le say that many a time to a distraught person to get them to settle down while the report disapears at the bottom of their stack of cases only to be "forgotten". It is their official statement every time they dont know what is going on. (Not knocking Le at all...they have a lot to deal with and I am sure that unless something concerns them about the situation, some things have to take priority over someone misplacing their husband)