sorrell skye
Former Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2009
- Messages
- 6,684
- Reaction score
- 7,007
I don't see any evidence of injuries on baby Elaina in the anonymous surveillance tape. The video tape is poor quality (as most inexpensive home video surveillance tapes tend to be).
Comments were posted upthread regarding supposed visible injuries on the baby (including a black eye). I've watched the video several times, and I see no visible injuries on the baby. IMO, due to the poor video quality, it's not possible to ascertain any details.
@ 0:08 I see a dark area around AS's left eye as she goes into the house. Does that mean AS has a black eye? Of course not - especially since that dark area isn't present a few seconds earlier in the video. Same goes for the supposed dark area around the baby's eye. The dark areas come & go, and I believe are an artifact of the poor video quality, recorded on what is more than likely an inexpensive camera.
The most useful information, IMO, is the date/timestamp, which shows AS and the baby on Saturday, June 1, @ about 6:35 p.m. If the date/timestamp on the video is accurate, we know that baby Elaina was alive at that time.
What time does JK say that AS contacted her to ask if she and her children could stay the night at her house on Federal Street? I don't think there has been a definitive report regarding the timeframe of that conversation.
Link to surveillance video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-WcfZGJg1w&feature=youtu.be
Comments were posted upthread regarding supposed visible injuries on the baby (including a black eye). I've watched the video several times, and I see no visible injuries on the baby. IMO, due to the poor video quality, it's not possible to ascertain any details.
@ 0:08 I see a dark area around AS's left eye as she goes into the house. Does that mean AS has a black eye? Of course not - especially since that dark area isn't present a few seconds earlier in the video. Same goes for the supposed dark area around the baby's eye. The dark areas come & go, and I believe are an artifact of the poor video quality, recorded on what is more than likely an inexpensive camera.
The most useful information, IMO, is the date/timestamp, which shows AS and the baby on Saturday, June 1, @ about 6:35 p.m. If the date/timestamp on the video is accurate, we know that baby Elaina was alive at that time.
What time does JK say that AS contacted her to ask if she and her children could stay the night at her house on Federal Street? I don't think there has been a definitive report regarding the timeframe of that conversation.
Link to surveillance video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-WcfZGJg1w&feature=youtu.be