Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I believe the court's website says hearing scheduled for 2 p.m. today (eastern time)What time do they start showing the door?
I can't find the stream.
Who has it?
Well yes and no.I had,had a link,but it would be against TOS to post it.But I think it was Dewine himself who said his wife had to tell him what those little houses at FR were for.
rita-newcomb-courtAnyone seeing the hearing yet? I can't find tt
WATCH LIVE: Final pretrial for grandmother facing charges in Pike County massacre scheduledAnyone seeing the hearing yet? I can't find tt
Thank you so much Betty! If I could like this twice I would!Judge Deering in, reading intro
Parties have resolved everything.
Ordered transcript of RN's GJ testimony, has been done. Pages 2-8 have not been provided, but they don't include any testimony. Defense wants those provided, state is objecting because none of her testimony is on pages 2-8.
Court ruling pages 2-8 don't have to be provided.
Balance has been provided.
He has audio interview of agents interviews of RN. He also wants audio of RN's GJ testimony. AC says he didn't ask for that, he has written portion.
AC says technically it can be done. Judge says to provide the audio portion of RN's GJ testimony.
Discussed counsel only material. Defense wanted that to be removed.
Agreement reached will still make it counsel only, but he can review the contents of those documents with her in his office, but not give her copies of the docs. Gerlach agrees. Pertains to GJ testimony and handwriting expert.
Forensic report of (RN's?) computer. Copy has been provided to defense, certain info redacted. Defense wants it included, state's objection related to relevance. Agreement that 1 part will be unredacted. Prosecution will provide unredacted to judge for his ruling whether all or only part should be redacted.
AC agreed to send unredacted part she already approved to Gerlach today.
Criminal Rule 16K
Curriculum vitae of experts, counsel has provided. Defense says CV's dont contain info about case numbers where some of these experts have testified before. AC suggests they have a conversation about it.
Judge is reading the law, says it only requires a summary of expert witness qualifications. Judge says summary is all that's required, if there's a valid argument, they can bring it up at trial. 3 experts CV's at issue. Judge rules for state on that one, says defense can cross examine expert witnesses about that at trial.
Trial Date
Junk says need a new date because lead investigator can't make it. Trial date will be moved to another date. If agreed, court will approve. Can be done within 30 days of current scheduled date of Oct 21.
Nothing further adjourned
Thank you so much Betty! If I could like this twice I would!
What I was talking about was Mr Reader taken off, Mr Junk appointing another prosecutor, a judge step aside when t first grand jury was held, JMOJohnny, I asked for clarification your draining the swamp post, so I'm confused. TIA
I always thought Grand Jury proceedings were guaranteed to be secret. IMO, seems many rulings on these motions contradict that. But I have limited knowledge about this stuff.
(IIRC, FW's attorney actually wanted names of GJ members. Of course it was not granted though)
Does it happen often that defense team asks for live recordings and/or transcripts of GJ proceedings?