OH - Pike Co - 8 in Rhoden Family Murdered Over Custody Issue - 4 Members Wagner Family Arrested #74

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Didn't get along with Hanna while they both lived there. Both were competing for Angela's approval.

Angela accused her of stealing $400.

Helped move a lot of family possessions to another building at Bethel Hill Rd home. After that, they set the home on fire.
A pan overfilled with grease on their propane stove. She was there that morning, left with Angela that day. Shopping for party stuff, her son's 1 month old birthday.
 
ames Pilcher
@jamespilcher
·
2m

She was there when house/mobile home on Bethel Hill Road burned down.
@local12
James Pilcher
@jamespilcher
·
2m

Says the family moved the things they didn't want burned into a separate building/cabin.
@local12
James Pilcher

@jamespilcher
·
1m

August 2013 - a month after her son was born. She and Angela went shopping that day for a party. Everyone else stayed behind. Insurance was the reason for burning it down. Tabitha helped write out receipts for items supposedly lost in the fire.
@local12
 
This family is so messed up.

Angela bought a receipt book and wrote receipts for things that would have been in the fire.

During the fire Angela and Tabatha were shopping for supplies for a party. A party for her 1 month old son.

Just listen to the witnesses. We can't understand how this could all be over a custody dispute, but when we listen to the dynamic of this family and the activities they engaged in and their behavior, it's all bizarre.
 
The arson testimony is to be considered in regard to George's participation in conspiracy with his family. We're getting somewhere. And we haven't yet heard about keeping the baby from TC or threatening to kill her. Tomorrow will be something.
 
Could someone explain the confusing instructions judge just read to jury about how they could or could not interpret the testimony they just heard?
 
Could someone explain the confusing instructions judge just read to jury about how they could or could not interpret the testimony they just heard?

It's that "other acts" qualification. He said they could only consider the evidence of the fire setting in the context of how the Wagners worked as a group to commit illegal acts. It can't be considered as a judgment on their character. In that sense, I suppose, it wouldn't be allowed as evidence because it had nothing to do with the murders. Hope that makes sense. IANAL

Same rule that prosecution can't bring up prior illegal activity if it had no link to the crime the person is being tried for. Prejudicial, I suppose.
 
Had to discuss with GW4 that she had been sexually abused as a child. Tabitha found out her sister told someone, so she had to tell GW4. GW4 was angry, wanted to go kill the guy who had abused Tabitha. She calmed him down.
Interesting parallel also to the violent reaction Jake had to the previous witness telling him the same thing.

And oh, how sad these girls' lives have been.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
130
Guests online
1,976
Total visitors
2,106

Forum statistics

Threads
599,728
Messages
18,098,743
Members
230,917
Latest member
CP95
Back
Top