ohioexpat63
On Time Out
- Joined
- May 21, 2016
- Messages
- 787
- Reaction score
- 7,235
Would the prosecutors bring some of T testimony forward without having corroborating testimony from AW and JW?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hear but this just seems to be the painful hoe they need to hoe in a case with a co-conspirator testifying in a comes case like thisSo far, the jury has seen and heard tons of evidence against Jake. George, who is on trial, has hardly been mentioned. I have watched live stream every day, read every tweet....still, just my opinion. BTW I believe GW is as guilty as the others, but my thoughts are about what the jury is thinking.
Definitely meant devout not devotedIs having sex with underage girls a "devoted fundamentalist Baptist" belief? That seems doubtful--it's more like cult behavior.
Great points! I could go here or there on Dana or Hannah being awake, but there sure is something weird about that whole Hannah situation. Sure, she could have turned to see him, turned away for cover and, then, get shot it the back of the head and behind the ear, but .... it ... well ... seems ... questionable, especially if he took the approach AC said in the opening. The repositioning so thr baby could feed with a moaning person on another room (DR) and an alive person in another room (CDJr) also seems odd. All possible, but also possible is he shot her the back of the head and is ashamed of that or he messed with her body for other reasons. It just feels squirrely.So JW lied when he said DR was awake on her phone
BBM
So are you saying that Jake lied when he said he killed Dana? Even if she was awake on her phone, she was lying in bed. What defense did she have against him? He sneaked into her bedroom at 3:32 AM and shot her in the head before she could react to anything. Think about it. It's 3:32 AM, dark in your house, you are not expecting someone to come sneaking in your bedroom with a gun. Then suddenly BAM! you are shot in the head twice before you know what hit you. Then he went back and fired 3 more shots into her head when he heard her making sounds. So yes Jake could have killed them all himself. In fact he plead guilty and admitted he killed Dana and Hannah and Chris JR and Frankie and Hazel. By himself.
that HR looked at him?
Yes, I am saying that was a bold face lie. You know why? Because the coroner said she was shot twice in the BACK of the head while she was lying on her side. So what do you think happened? Jake walked in and Hannah looked at him and Jake gently whispered to her "Please, turn your head away so I don't have to look you in the eyes while I kill you."? I don't know of any world where that would happen or that she would have just obediently turned her head so Jake could put two bullets in the back of her head.
Unlike Jake, evidence in an autopsy, given by a coroner does not lie. Two bullet holes, back of the head. You figure out how that could happen if she was lying in bed, looking at him?
That is a crock of BS about him repositioning her body so the baby could nurse also. She was already on her side. He didn't give a FHF about that infant whether it starved to death or not. If he had, he wouldn't have been shooting a .22 bullet in the bed with that baby where it could have easily ricocheted and hit the baby killing her or the bullet could have passed through Hannah's body and killed the baby. So someone please tell me why they think he cared one tiny bit about a baby he knew was not his. If he cared he would not have killed that baby's mother depriving little KR from ever breastfeeding again.
JMO
Thank you! It was me asking!To whomever asked who we will see tomorrow, just caught up here and don't want to go back and find the post. I am now checking today's news and Twitter's on the case and saw this from James Pilcher-
The next witness - if we get to him - is BCI agent Jon Jenkins, who has opted in for video.
@local12
eta-also found this-
The prosecution's case continues Wednesday with another special agent for the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation taking the stand, followed by the return of the state’s phone and computer records specialist.
Wagner's ex-wife testifies about running away from family home in Pike Co. massacre trial
He’s accused of taking part in the killing of eight members of the Rhoden and Gilley families in April 2016.Monday, George's ex-wife testified about the Wagnerslocal12.com
It occurred to me that he, Jake, might have waked her up intentionally, so she could see he was about to murder her. One last act of cruelty! Just a thought.Great points! I could go here or there on Dana or Hannah being awake, but there sure is something weird about that whole Hannah situation. Sure, she could have turned to see him, turned away for cover and, then, get shot it the back of the head and behind the ear, but .... it ... well ... seems ... questionable, especially if he took the approach AC said in the opening. The repositioning so thr baby could feed with a moaning person on another room (DR) and an alive person in another room (CDJr) also seems odd. All possible, but also possible is he shot her the back of the head and is ashamed of that or he messed with her body for other reasons. It just feels squirrely.
No, I can't. I can't wrap my head around a mother acting so irresponsibly, and a whole slew of other adjectives that I'll just leave alone.I had to stop watching before this part. Wow. Can you imagine?
I hope they don't much go after the inside person. It's time for the queen to lose her crown. MOOThe good christian lady who lives by the bible stealing narcotics from the nursing home she owned. It's pretty easy to fudge records especially if you own the place. But, who worked there helped her to obtain this. Narcotics are typically locked away, but again, it's easy to fudge the books. DEA/state should be investigating that aspect now that it's publicly out there. Again, someone(s) on the inside helped her do this. And I'm SURE word of mouth made sure everyone there knew about it.
All MOO.
That behavior is neither devoted nor devout. It's also not mature, showing good judgment, or restraint.Definitely meant devout not devoted
What is going on with his tie?!His idea or maybe Angie, through her attorneys, told whoever brought his clothes to the courthouse what she likes seeing him wear. Someone had to find out where their clothes are, gain access, then pick something out. I assume family members. Someone has to be in charge of their vehicles, property, animals, yard work, upkeep, Bank accounts, mail, packages, bills etc....
When there isn't any family or close friend available the attorneys can get someone appointed through the court.
Here is a photo of him dressed up on his Facebook:
George Wagner updated his profile picture - September 11th, 2018
My thought , if a farm worker/ friend could walk into Billy’s room and see all that - weapons, vest, murder equipment, etc. surely FW could see it too. Wouldn’t FW question it? I can not believe anything would be inside FW home without her knowing about it and her permission.He was probably helping out some with running the farm, too. He may have also liked being back in his own room, with lots of space. IIRC from some photos of the bullet proof vests during one of the raids, it looked like he had a new, recently remodeled spa-type bathroom. Things were probably quieter and roomier at FWF.
Is it pronounced bull-vine? TIA I haven't heard of that name for a son.While early news reporting spelled it Bovine (2016), current reporting does indeed spell it Bulvine.
I'm sorry, but all it makes me think is I can't imagine how Looney Tunes, toxic, and abusive the W environment had to be for T to have to resort to those measures. With the throwing of the 2x4 and chasing her with the gun, too, it all sounds like just another day at the Ws. It makes them look atrocious and purely toxic. MOOI think defense attorney did a good job, he elicited testimony about her behavior that does not paint her in the best light, the Xanax questioning was very good, now the jury can consider that it wasn't AW where her daughter got the drug, all a defense can do is offer alternatives, to give the jury pause for thought,
and she isn't a weak and feeble female she gave GW more than he could handle when she bit and grabbed his nuts to make him let her go, and she is very strong to have survived SA and to have somehow maintained a relationship with her mum who enabled the abuse as she testified to
So it isn’t possible that she looked at him and then looked down at her baby before he shot her?So it isn’t possible that she looked at him and then looked down at her baby before he shot her?
If he didn’t care if the baby starved to death, why was he at the hospital hours later trying to take her home with him?
Anyone who isn't George.Whom do you think Defense will say left the shoe prints if it wasn’t GWIV? They were two sizes of a left shoe That AW is on video purchasing.
They're pure alright! Pure EVIL.And likely won't. They're pure. It's everyone else who is guilty. Thus sayeth the defense.