Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What!?OMG, some W thinks they are Wyatt Earp.
Judge needs to work this out so the jury can hear the evidence without a zillion interruptions by defense. JMO, this goes beyond trying to get some grounds for appeal. It's preventing the jury from hearing evidence that has been approved by law and by the court.This is going to be painful if this is how the rest of the trial is going to go. Finally, we hear George and now nothing but objections.
GW4 kept repeating, "all hell is comin' with me". Talking about the female BCI agent being alone with one of the kids.What!?
Did you also hear right around that time frame the car door pinging because it was opened up?GW4 was saying that.
the presentation has been approved by nobody, neither has the transcript, what I hear may be very different from what somebody else hears when the recording is this poor, the judge knows that cherry picking snippets of conversation without allowing the jury to hear the whole conversation is problematic, the context is as important as the conversation the state wants the jury to focus on,Judge needs to work this out so the jury can hear the evidence without a zillion interruptions by defense. JMO, this goes beyond trying to get some grounds for appeal. It's preventing the jury from hearing evidence that has been approved by law and by the court.
The agent testifying said they would isolate the left or right sometimes to cancel the stereo and make it mono, to hear certain snippets of dialogue. Maybe that is just translating to your headphones? Would broadcasting do that?all of my headphones I've tried did the exact same thing. Then the left stops working at a point. Figure it must be my computer settings which I've yet to figure out how to fix.
Same here. I'm going to try another channel. I like WCPO9 but the audio today is awful.all of my headphones I've tried did the exact same thing. Then the left stops working at a point. Figure it must be my computer settings which I've yet to figure out how to fix.
Maybe not problems with the state, but the defense not wanting the jury to hear what the Wagners are saying, threatening, etc.seems to be lots of legal issues with how the state wants to present the wiretap information
Prosecutors have always cherry picked taped conversations for the courtroom. The huge amount of audio would be too overwhelming. The Mob trials have always snipped portions to play in court from wiretaps to clarify for the jury parts of conversations taped. AJMOthe presentation has been approved by nobody, neither has the transcript, what I hear may be very different from what somebody else hears when the recording is this poor, the judge knows that cherry picking snippets of conversation without allowing the jury to hear the whole conversation is problematic, the context is as important as the conversation the state wants the jury to focus on,
I have court TV on Law and Crime on my laptop. Not sure how it compares to other stations though.Same here. I'm going to try another channel. I like WCPO9 but the audio today is awful.
the Judge seems to be sustaining the objections more today, and calling the attorneys to the bench for sidebars over the issue of the state wanting to summarize conversations or play selected snippets, the Judge seems to be aware that the jury need to know the context of the conversation is important not just a few selected words picked out,Prosecutors have always cherry picked taped conversations for the courtroom. The huge amount of audio would be too overwhelming. The Mob trials have always snipped portions to play in court from wiretaps to clarify for the jury parts of conversations taped. AJMO
Defense insisted the state spend several months and a lot of money to have these recordings transcribed.Prosecutors have always cherry picked taped conversations for the courtroom. The huge amount of audio would be too overwhelming. The Mob trials have always snipped portions to play in court from wiretaps to clarify for the jury parts of conversations taped. AJMO
It seems AC is talking about the "descriptors" included in the transcripts being removed because of defense objections?the Judge seems to be sustaining the objections more today, and calling the attorneys to the bench for sidebars over the issue of the state wanting to summarize conversations or play selected snippets, the Judge seems to be aware that the jury need to know the context of the conversation is important not just a few selected words picked out,
the transcript is also at issue as we all hear things differently and much of this audio is indecipherable, so who does get to decide what words are said on it
I agree, that's unacceptable and if it was done on purpose to now upset the trialDefense insisted the state spend several months and a lot of money to have these recordings transcribed.
Defense wanted them transcribed. They then sat on those transcriptions for a year and made no objections in pre-trial. I think at one point, they admitted they hadn't even read them.
Defense is free to cherry-pick their own parts of the recordings/transcriptions
I agree, that's unacceptable and if it was done on purpose to now upset the trial![]()