https://www.websleuths.com/forums/t...amily-arrested-41.411170/reply?quote=14709692
TRUDIE I'm going to present a contrarian view (cuz that's just what I do
) If indeed FW has over 1200 purchases in the last 4 years....I think that is a pretty good indication of "what she usually purchases;" Especially types and amounts of feeds & medicine. And, I believe these companies also ask for confirmation/or send you a notification of the purchase & in some cases tracking numbers even before shipping. But then, out of the clear blue and shortly before the massacre of 8 human beings, purchases were made on her, FW/FWF 's on line shopping account for bullet proof vests. I am trying to present the "opposite assumption" that a pattern of shopping, can also work against a defendant. Example: Larissa Schuster, the owner of a laboratory, suddenly ordering 18 gallons of hydrochloric acid just before murdering her husband. (They found his body in a 55 gal drum filled with hydrochloric acid.) My point...."out-of-the-ordinary-purchases" whether legal or not.... are going to raise flags with investigators. (In previous years, the lab barely used one bottle.) I hope this brings a different view of "purchases, " as Larissa tried to pass them off as not only legal, but also harmless items a lab would regularly order. NOT!
imo...FW lied because she knew what they were for, and who they would implicate.
ps...the edit button is our friend.
TRUDIE I'm going to present a contrarian view (cuz that's just what I do
) If indeed FW has over 1200 purchases in the last 4 years....I think that is a pretty good indication of "what she usually purchases;" Especially types and amounts of feeds & medicine. And, I believe these companies also ask for confirmation/or send you a notification of the purchase & in some cases tracking numbers even before shipping. But then, out of the clear blue and shortly before the massacre of 8 human beings, purchases were made on her, FW/FWF 's on line shopping account for bullet proof vests. I am trying to present the "opposite assumption" that a pattern of shopping, can also work against a defendant. Example: Larissa Schuster, the owner of a laboratory, suddenly ordering 18 gallons of hydrochloric acid just before murdering her husband. (They found his body in a 55 gal drum filled with hydrochloric acid.) My point...."out-of-the-ordinary-purchases" whether legal or not.... are going to raise flags with investigators. (In previous years, the lab barely used one bottle.) I hope this brings a different view of "purchases, " as Larissa tried to pass them off as not only legal, but also harmless items a lab would regularly order. NOT!imo...FW lied because she knew what they were for, and who they would implicate.
ps...the edit button is our friend.
Last edited:
