Jonas_Klein
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2018
- Messages
- 253
- Reaction score
- 1,462
Ok. I understand. The Ws did not threatened officials, if the Ws did not believe these officials would be threatened by the conversation.They never threatened anyone, to threaten someone you actually have to say something to them.
The Wagner's were talking amongst themselves but never went to someone directly to threaten them. All their talk was just that, just talk, it stayed behind closed doors.
It's not against the law to have conversation in your own house, but it is against the law to see Special Agent Shider at your house and threaten to do him harm while holding a weapon.
Threats are a different matter, and the statute is Harassment. In fact, threats to kill can be a felony. Otherwise “threats” are a gross misdemeanor. Illegal threats include threats to do bodily harm, threaten to destroy property, or threats to do anything “which is maliciously intended to substantially harm the person threatened or another with respect to his or her physical or mental health or safety.” Either immediately or in the future.
- SEATTLE 911 -- A POLICE AND CRIME BLOG...............
The only caveat is that the person who is threatened must be “placed in reasonable fear that the threat will be carried out”.
For example, if a person calls from New York and says he is coming right over to beat somebody up, and that person knew the other person was in New York, then this would not fit the statute. Probably no crime. However, same words from someone who is across town, then it could be illegal, depending on the circumstances.
What's the point of using this argument in denying bail to Ws if it's not a crime to have these talks in a private conversation?