Apparently, this has to do with the discussion yesterday about Jake's defense attorneys wanting to get money approved to hire some defense experts. Maybe they want someone to testify about ballistics or the evidence on the silencer part? IDK. Why would that need to be kept from the public? Bizarre.
They should give up the pretense and just hold these trials in private.
ETA: Why three motions to be kept under seal? I can understand sealing some things after a trial is over, but I don't understand sealing a motion during the pre-trial phase, before the trial has even begun??
ETA2: Here's an editorial of sorts objecting to this kind of secrecy in another court where it has become common:
When It Comes to Sealing Court Records, The Presumption of Public Access Requires That You “Just Say No” - Public Justice
The way I interpret it in this situation, is it really necessary to go to these lengths to protect the defendant from public knowledge of details of the crime they're accused of? According to the First Amendment, the court needs to show a compelling need for secrecy.
JMO, it's one thing to seal from the public information about discovery evidence, it's a completely different issue to seal the actual motions.
In the opinion of some legal folks, the court is required to justify this action.
With the hidden motions, are Jake and his attorneys threatening to implicate other parties and crimes involved in the murders or events that led up to the murders?