OH - Pike County: 8 people from one family dead as police hunt for killer(s) #10

[cady]

It appears possibly on the side with the trees opposite side of where the mobile home would be and I'm willing to bet the photographer took the pic while on his stomach. Guessing he was trying to stay out of site

I just don't think it's the same barn. If pic was taken from the back, pinkish foliage would be on the right. Also, I don't see the large tree behind the front view pic. Maybe just me, but one looks much newer and broader than the other. whatever......JMO

 

[Audrey Horne]

It appears possibly on the side with the trees opposite side of where the mobile home would be and I'm willing to bet the photographer took the pic while on his stomach. Guessing he was trying to stay out of site

To me, it looks like the photo was taken from the window of a car. See the diagonal from lower left to upper central, it looks a little like mosquito netting in the trees? I think that's a reflection of a car interior, maybe.

 

[Meemaw12]

@hollyzachariah to Kevin

@Kevin10TV did they open the roads today?

Kevin replies

@hollyzachariah no, we drove up and saw barn boarded up and was told to go back. I think next week




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Audrey Horne]

Yeah, this is at Dana's. I found another aerial view that clearly shows the red-budded tree to the left of the barn.

The picture comes from this article: http://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2016/04/26/mass-shootings-by-the-numbers/83549302/

 

[Meemaw12]

So from pic it appears a red vehicle wasn't towed


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[creepcrusher]

Yeah, this is at Dana's. I found another aerial view that clearly shows the red-budded tree to the left of the barn.

The picture comes from this article: http://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2016/04/26/mass-shootings-by-the-numbers/83549302/

Clearly. The other picture is just take. From behind the barn. You can see the same tree and truck in the same spot from behind.

 

[dayna769]

I need to go back into FR's facebook and the one who has the derby car to see why it wasn't at FR's, does anyone know already?

NM Most of FR's comments and posts are gone, forgot about that.

Based on on the things I have seen, I believe it was at 799 Left Fork. Not where KR was found, but across the street. That is just what I think from looking at pictures and watching videos.

 

[creepcrusher]

Clearly. The other picture is just take. From behind the barn. You can see the same tree and truck in the same spot from behind.

Sorry. Butter fingers over here and can't edit from my phone. I'm no where near a computer.

 

[Iona]

Seems most likely it was already that way. I can't think of a reason LE would have removed a window and door.

Ummm. I can, DNA!

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

 

[cady]

Sorry. Butter fingers over here and can't edit from my phone. I'm no where near a computer.

New pic taken today was taken from a car.....they were told to leave. No way they DROVE behind the barn at Dana's. JMO

 

[Meemaw12]

Might have boarded up to keep anyone from stealing seeing pot plants if there were any in there dunno


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Mmaaix]

Too give perspective of angle in picture look in the previous pics on the right side where there appears to be a sand patch, that is where the monkey grass or whatever you call it is growing on the new pic. It's taken at a slope I'm guessing the road is down hill from the property and it's been edited or zoomed hence why it looks so much broader it's zoomed a lot

 

[oceanblueeyes]

I wonder if the person who wrote that blog is one of us... Similarly, I've also noticed that often when we put out a new theory or line of thought, I will shortly see a news story running with it. I think websleuths is being websleuthed!

In many cases discussed here the police will come out and say they have received several calls/emails/letters about what someone's theory is about a certain case. Every time LE says that I do wonder if it is someone here at WS. Here at WS there are indeed some great detectives/sleuthers and have helped solve cases before buy finding actual evidence. I am constantly amazed how talented so many are and the great abilities they have to rundown evidence.

I think if the blogger came from here they would tell us. Several on WS do write blogs.

But speaking about theories.

I remember during the Scott Peterson case the Prosecutor said he received several letters from those who felt they knew what happen including where Laci's body was because she wasn't found until four months after the murder. This was before SP was arrested so it probably does happen. During the trial itself the Judge had to stop the trial one time and hold a hearing because he had received a letter from someone saying their dog told them who had murdered Laci. That really happened. Even though they knew it was ridiculous they did have to discuss it and get it on the record. I imagine others in law enforcement have received some doozies/tips/theories from others (not from here though) who think they know what happened. I imagine some of them don't even live in the same state but do it anyway. They may be the kind that thinks they are smarter than the investigators on the case.

I can certainly understand alerting police if someone is aware of evidence that may help any case even if the person doesn't think its that significant. That should always be done but when LE says they get tips that actually wind up just being theories then I think that is wasting the officers' valuable time. And it seems that is happening more and more nowadays.

I have never done so myself but if I had actual knowledge of some type of evidence in any case I certainly would let the police know it immediately. I think all of us at WS would report it to the police because we know how important these cases truly are to the victims and their families.

 

[oceanblueeyes]

Might have boarded up to keep anyone from stealing seeing pot plants if there were any in there dunno


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I have seen LE take windows and doors with them during search warrants in other cases. There may be some kind of evidence they think is significant. Maybe that is where they think the murderers gained entry. Or maybe there is a lot of blood spatter patterns in those areas. They will even take up the floor including carpet and even the hardwood if they think it contains evidence or take sections of the wall down. So no telling what has been taken by LE inside and out of all four homes.

Of course if they took it down they would put plywood up so no one could access the home.

 

[InspectaX]

You know, withholding the information about whether dogs were in, out, tied up, etc. is one of the irritating ways the AG has been handling communications about this case. Compared to everything else that has happened in this tragedy and the amount of evidence they're gathering, its difficult to understand why they can't release some basic info about dogs in/out so the public will stop obsessing over it. As someone else said, it's almost like they're "gaslighting" the public. Hope I'm wrong. JMO.

..............

Withholding detailed information is standard LE practice for good reason .... only the real perpetrator/s will know how they went about doing stuff. During interrogation, if they own up to the deed, they will be quizzed on the minutiae to establish guilt-credibility. Perhaps they own up and then deny it later. LE must be sure they have really got the culprits. They sometimes get nutters looking for fame and attention ...

 

[Toralei]

Speculating.

In in a round about way that may not meet official standards
we believe someone (of the original 7) was not found in the house, but in the woods.
indicating fleeing.
dogs may have been with him. Let out by him, stayed with him, or ran.
maybe that's why "dogs were nowhere to be found"

Pls delete if if no considered ok to post

I thought it was "proven" that this person was found in a home....

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

 

[K.L.Puyallup]

In many cases discussed here the police will come out and say they have received several calls/emails/letters about what someone's theory is about a certain case. Every time LE says that I do wonder if it is someone here at WS. Here at WS there are indeed some great detectives/sleuthers and have helped solve cases before buy finding actual evidence. I am constantly amazed how talented so many are and the great abilities they have to rundown evidence.

I think if the blogger came from here they would tell us. Several on WS do write blogs.

The blogger did come forward and is one of us

 

[cady]

Too give perspective of angle in picture look in the previous pics on the right side where there appears to be a sand patch, that is where the monkey grass or whatever you call it is growing on the new pic. It's taken at a slope I'm guessing the road is down hill from the property and it's been edited or zoomed hence why it looks so much broader it's zoomed a lot

JMO according to aerial view on google maps.....its all thick woods behind the barn at Dana's. I don't care that much, but I'd like to know where the new pic was taken. Dayna suggested near Left Fork residence. JMO

 

[winterrose]

So from pic it appears a red vehicle wasn't towed


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yep CRjr had a silver car, wonder if that's the one in front of the barn or garage, if looks to be gone.

 

[K.L.Puyallup]

JMO according to aerial view on google maps.....its all thick woods behind the barn at Dana's. I don't care that much, but I'd like to know where the new pic was taken. Dayna suggested near Left Fork residence. JMO

I don't see any residences near the Left Fork property that resemble this structure. If someone would be so kind as to provide a google earth image, I'd be grateful