California?
Yes. See page 32 . My post 477 in response to your post and last link.
California?
But also dismissed "without prejudice" ... Doesn't that mean it can be brought back through that court if needed?
No not curious at all for me, as he may have had family or friends there.
A mechanics lien transfers the title to the mechanic. LM said there would be cars not in Chris Sr. name. That doesn't sound like any mechanics lien I've ever heard of.
For someone that doesn't go over to CR Sr home very often he sure knows a lot huh?!!!!
Pondering....Jenkins and Rhoden seem to be common names in the area. Wonder if there is a kinship connection any where?
No not curious at all for me, as he may have had family or friends there.
I finally found a new date 7/1/16 for Joel Jenkins and I see no FTA or warrant.
http://pikecountycpcourt.org/eservi...A1-viwkWnCTIGt2dP-QXg128jv2Fy641aZbjjQScyC3jw
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There is a Rhoden living in California too... But I don't think they are involved either. She is on Pike court records.
Honestly, I kind of think the mailing from California was somewhat of a setup. Who in there right mind orders that much marijuana in one box?? Did you see how high the stack of it was with Reader standing next to it? I sort of think someone was attempting to get rid of them as competition by sending them a large package in the mail. Then once they were busted for the package, their home was searched and their grow operation and lab was shut down. Plus, it appeared that they had plenty to work with at their property and didn't actually need any from California. I'm just throwing out a possibility. I don't have any proof of that. There are so many mailing schemes coming from California and that area that it wouldn't be hard to hookup with one but I'm not so sure a competitor would want to throw out the money to pay for that amount of marijuana to just get rid of competition. So I go back and forth on what I think about that.
I had not read too much about JJ case until now. 2 people dead not 1. Wow.
Just jotting down some random notes
-Post Office pot allegedly sent from California
-JJ has recent ties to California
-JJ had experience working with LE dogs.
-1st shooting death involved a car chase and subject ends up on a dead end street and gets shot and killed by LE. From article linked below
"Another officer fired at Rookers vehicle, but Jenkins appears to be the only one whose bullets hit Rooker"
-2nd shooting death from article below is claimed to be accident but just so happened to be right in HEAD.
"The deputy called a nonemergency line to report that he had accidentally shot Jason Brady in the head"
-From article its one thing for a prosecuter to loan a gun to a LE officer but I have never ever heard where one routinely trades sells and lends guns to LE officers and friends all the time. He should have been a gun dealer instead of a prosecuter IMO:
"The Pike County case has gained national attention as well as curiosity from those who wonder why a prosecutor would lend a gun to a deputy. Junk said thats just how it goes in tight-knit communities such as his. He routinely trades, sells and lends guns to law-enforcement officers and friends."
-Aprill 22nd is a no show for a court appearance and no news about his whereabouts.
-In the 2nd link below, when news of the mass shooting happened this struck me as very strange and IMO there is some sort of tension between the family and the Sheriffs office. I found these comments very strange and they scream out to me that the Sheriff knows the family would not care to have their help at all.
"I've given the family precautionary measures to make. They know we're available.""
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2015/12/11/ex-pike-county-deputy-under-scrutiny.html
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/22/us/ohio-shooting-pike-county/
I had not read too much about JJ case until now. 2 people dead not 1. Wow.
Just jotting down some random notes
-Post Office pot allegedly sent from California
-JJ has recent ties to California
-JJ had experience working with LE dogs.
-1st shooting death involved a car chase and subject ends up on a dead end street and gets shot and killed by LE. From article linked below
"Another officer fired at Rookers vehicle, but Jenkins appears to be the only one whose bullets hit Rooker"
-2nd shooting death from article below is claimed to be accident but just so happened to be right in HEAD.
"The deputy called a nonemergency line to report that he had accidentally shot Jason Brady in the head"
-From article its one thing for a prosecuter to loan a gun to a LE officer but I have never ever heard where one routinely trades sells and lends guns to LE officers and friends all the time. He should have been a gun dealer instead of a prosecuter IMO:
"The Pike County case has gained national attention as well as curiosity from those who wonder why a prosecutor would lend a gun to a deputy. Junk said thats just how it goes in tight-knit communities such as his. He routinely trades, sells and lends guns to law-enforcement officers and friends."
-Aprill 22nd is a no show for a court appearance and no news about his whereabouts.
-In the 2nd link below, when news of the mass shooting happened this struck me as very strange and IMO there is some sort of tension between the family and the Sheriffs office. I found these comments very strange and they scream out to me that the Sheriff knows the family would not care to have their help at all.
"I've given the family precautionary measures to make. They know we're available.""
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2015/12/11/ex-pike-county-deputy-under-scrutiny.html
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/22/us/ohio-shooting-pike-county/
Does anyone know if the Mothers of IJ's babies are related or friends. I don't buy that "they thought they would get the 25000.00 reward" bit. I would think it really odd that not one but two of his ex's called to tell LE he did it. It shows what kind of person he has showed himself to be, to his ex girlfriends at least, when not one but two of his ex's think he is capable of murdering 8 people and virtually wiping out an entire branch of a family. That's not something I would want any ex of mine thinking let alone two ex's.
Are you referring to "them" as in the one who picked up the package?