Everyday Grace
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2015
- Messages
- 1,694
- Reaction score
- 97
I don't think that little boy could ID anybody. We don't know if he saw anything or was asleep. But a child that young is by no means considered credible. They lack any ability to distinguish between fact and "fantasy," which means when asked they have a very high likelihood of commingling things they actually experienced with stuff that they believe they are supposed to respond. Kids that age operate by "faking it." That is, they are incredible little imitators of everything that goes on around them. That is how they learn. They are trying things. If it works for them they repeat it. If not, they go on to something else.
Michael Morton's then 3 year-old son's eyewitness account of his mother's murder was discounted for some of those reasons, among others.
(It didn't fit the now disbarred and totally disgraced prosecutor's notion of who committed the murder.)
Turned out that the child's account was accurate.
http://www.innocenceproject.org/cases/michael-morton/
Not saying that every 3 year-old can provide accurate information or that this particular child witnessed anything.
Just saying that automatically discounting information from a child based upon their age can hinder getting to the real facts of a case.