I remember hearing Leonard say that, but I really thought he was trying to call somebody's bluff. That look in his eyes told me he may have had a suspect or two in the back of his mind, and maybe hoping to make somebody nervous. He doesn't strike me as being the type of person who would allow the persons involved to get away with killing eight family members. And he may have the old tried and true "give 'em enough rope they'll hang themselves!
Does anyone remember in which news article it stated by co-workers that DR got a phone call before she left work that night that appeared to upset her? I think it was one of the earliest ones but can't find it now. I just wondered if anyone else remembered that also? I can't remember if it was on the work place phone or on her cell or if it was mentioned which phone it was on. And if so have LE obtained the health centers phone records?
Click here: EXCLUSIVE: 'Ain't got no revenge in our hearts,' Pike Co. family says
Could this be the information that LE says is being withheld?
According to Leonard Manley, when Bobby Jo showed up last Friday morning, the front door was locked and the dogs were nowhere to be found. There were at least two pit bulls, a "wolf-dog" and "coon dogs" that lived with his family members. Manley questioned why the killer or killers didn't shoot the dogs, which he described as fierce.
"Why wouldn't they do that?" Leonard Manley said. "Somebody had to know them dogs."
I would think the opposite. If they thought Brentley's mom was a killer they would NEVER give her custody. The 3 kids "in danger" are Gilleys. Therefore, I would think of they suspected anyone, it would be a Gilley. No one knows, but I'd be willing to bet no female had anything to do with this. This was a very well planned murder of multiple people. This had to be done by men, cold blooded men. This is not the work of a woman. Women kill sometimes, but not like this.This is why my thoughts keep going to a custody issue between FR and the mother of B. Three children in danger and one not. Notice that SW is lumped in with those in danger. Sometimes it is not what is said but what is not said. I think him leaving B out of the grave danger statement speaks volumes. Maybe because Sheriff Reader knows that one child's mother had something to do with all this therefore that child would not be in danger but the others might. Custody issue was the first thing LM said.
Click here: Rhodens scoff at Pike County sheriff's comments
Some family members scoff at Reader's assertions, saying if danger remains why hasn't the county, the sheriff's office or the attorney general's office checked on the other surviving child, Brentley Rhoden, 3, who is now living with his mother. Some say Reader's comments have put the larger community on edge -- again.
Brentley Rhoden is the half-brother of Ruger. The toddler was found alive and unharmed in the living room of his father's trailer on Union Hill Road. Clarence "Frankie" Rhoden, 20, is the father of both Brentley and Ruger. He was found shot to death alongside his fiancé, Hannah Gilley, in their bed that morning. That couple's baby boy, Ruger, was found physically unharmed lying between them.
"Ask me how many calls I have gotten to check on Brentley,'' said Samantha Robinson, the toddler's grandmother. "Zero."
"I protect him,'' she said.
Sorry 2 kids "in danger". KR and RRI would think the opposite. If they thought Brentley's mom was a killer they would NEVER give her custody. The 3 kids "in danger" are Gilleys. Therefore, I would think of they suspected anyone, it would be a Gilley. No one knows, but I'd be willing to bet no female had anything to do with this. This was a very well planned murder of multiple people. This had to be done by men, cold blooded men. This is not the work of a woman. Women kill sometimes, but not like this.
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
Click here: EXCLUSIVE: 'Ain't got no revenge in our hearts,' Pike Co. family says
Could this be the information that LE says is being withheld?
According to Leonard Manley, when Bobby Jo showed up last Friday morning, the front door was locked and the dogs were nowhere to be found. There were at least two pit bulls, a "wolf-dog" and "coon dogs" that lived with his family members. Manley questioned why the killer or killers didn't shoot the dogs, which he described as fierce.
"Why wouldn't they do that?" Leonard Manley said. "Somebody had to know them dogs."
Bobby Jo declined to discuss the crime scenes or talk much Monday, but did say she and several of her family members had talked to investigators repeatedly. The last time, investigators came and woke up her and five other people at 3:41 a.m. Sunday, she said.
"The Pike County Sheriff's wanted to ask me the same questions the BCI did,'' she said, adding that investigators seem to be fixated on when she found the bodies. They said it was earlier, Bobby Jo says. But she said, she went there around 7 a.m.
"I think they should all just leave us alone,'' she said in a moment between tears.
Leonard Manley looked up as his daughter and sighed.
"Look, we are just hillbillies,'' he said. "We ain't got no revenge in our hearts.''
Somehow I thought she had worked there longer than 6 months.
Dana Rhoden worked full-time as a nursing assistant at the Hillside Skilled Nursing and Rehab Center in Peebles, which is about 10 miles west of her home.
Matthew Smith, the centers administrator, said she had worked at the 49-bed facility since October and called her a kind and caring worker who was loved by patients and co-workers alike. She worked Monday through Friday from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. and an every-other-weekend rotation.
On Thursday, she worked a double-shift after a co-worker was unable to work. She overslept and arrived at 8 a.m. and worked until about 11 p.m., Hillside manager Heather Frost-Young said.
Frost-Young, who also went to high school with Dana, described her as bubbly, hard-working and had a huge heart who loved her children.
"She was just so proud of them,'' she said.
She also thought it was odd that Rhoden's two pit bulls were outside on the front porch, one sitting in a recliner.
Manley got up about 6:10 a.m. to wake her 15-year-old daughter by 6:30 a.m. and get her on the bus to school by 7. Then -- as she did most every weekday morning -- she drove over to the trailer of Christopher Rhoden, Sr., 40, to feed his dogs and chickens. Rhoden was her brother-in-law.
In every article I have read about the Appalachians and Pike county, the central theme throughout is family. Family is everything, more so than in other areas of the country. I don't mean that in other parts of the USA people care less about family, but just that they don't tend to depend on them for survival as much. Maybe there are those on here from the general area that maybe could correct me if I am wrong.
But what I am trying to say (badly at that) is that if family is such a huge part of life in the area, is it so far out there in left field that someone might kill if custody of a child is threatened?
Sorry 2 kids "in danger". KR and RR
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
The only thing that throws me off of the custody motive is KR. I don't see how he fits into it. Someone had to drive 10 miles to kill KR -- he was specifically targeted.
I still think CRsr & KR were the main targets -- over some kind of shady business dealings --and the other 6 were somehow able to implicate the killers.
*my 1st post btw. The websleuth community is amazing. Some real sharp ppl on here. This case fascinates me. I really hope we get some news soon.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The only thing that throws me off of the custody motive is KR. I don't see how he fits into it. Someone had to drive 10 miles to kill KR -- he was specifically targeted.
I still think CRsr & KR were the main targets -- over some kind of shady business dealings --and the other 6 were somehow able to implicate the killers.
*my 1st post btw. The websleuth community is amazing. Some real sharp ppl on here. This case fascinates me. I really hope we get some news soon.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe KR, CR, and all of them had been threatening whomever had abused HR. Maybe they were very protective of her. I don't know who abused her, but on her social media it appears someone did. Also, CG's sister stayed with the Rhoden family, so if it was him that was abusive (and I don't know) then it would make sense he punished them all. Gilley makes sense in every aspect, except that with that situation it would be hard to find help, and in DV it would be emotional and hard to not leave evidence. CG is young and I can't see him doing it this well, but no one knows.
I still want to believe it was a drug organization type hit. I don't completely buy into the family theory. Dogs are not hard to distract with meat.
So my theories are either drug organization (maybe related to other murders), or CG.
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
The only thing that throws me off of the custody motive is KR. I don't see how he fits into it. Someone had to drive 10 miles to kill KR -- he was specifically targeted.
I still think CRsr & KR were the main targets -- over some kind of shady business dealings --and the other 6 were somehow able to implicate the killers.
*my 1st post btw. The websleuth community is amazing. Some real sharp ppl on here. This case fascinates me. I really hope we get some news soon.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk