If it wasn't related to the cause of her death, is it really relevant? Feeling a little uneasy thinking about where this discussion might be going. Since no one here is a medical professional, it might be best to avoid speculation.
ETA: Below is a link to all of the redacted autopsy reports
http://www.ohioattorneygeneral.gov/...BCI/Pike-County-Final-Autopsies-REDACTED.aspx
Hannah Gilley's begins at p.58 of 66. I'm not seeing anything to indicate an abnormality WRT her reproductive organs (p. 63 of 66)
Hanna Rhoden's autopsy report begins at p. 45 of 66. The portion of the report dealing with her reproductive organs begins on p. 49 of 66. In my non-expert view, the description seems consistent with a woman who had just given birth.
According to news media reports, Hanna Rhoden gave birth to a child just 4 days prior to the murders
http://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2016/07/29/rhoden-case-hate-seeing-my-daughter-cry/87645382/
Am I missing something? It's been easy to get the two Hanna/Hannahs confused in these discussions. It's also easy to lose track of which victim's report you're reading in this long document.