If LE are right about the direction they are heading, they really dropped the ball.
Why did it take them a year to act when they must have had a long time ago, most, if not all, the evidence they have now? If BJM is ruled in, they aren't saying, they have publicly brought all the suspicion on the W family and JM.
Why didn't they name JW as a POI or suspect and forbid him from leaving, if that's what he is? Surely they were watching him since they had suspicious texts from the night of the murder and saw him selling his house, packing up and talking about Alaska. They let him go and now they're searching his stuff, I guess they took it where all the other confiscated trailers are sitting. It's crazy..
LE can't simply decide to name someone as a suspect and prevent them from relocating. They may think someone did it, but they still have to have some real evidence to support that before they can officially do anything about it -- even just publicly naming someone as a suspect has consequences and they need something to back it up.
No doubt JW & his family have better access to legal counsel than the Manley's -- and they are likely very aware of the fact that they are free to move or go on vacation or do anything else they want to at this point. They can move to Alaska or Canada or France for that matter -- if LE has a valid legal reason to bring JW back to OH they can, but otherwise he is free to go as he pleases.
JW & family originally put their home on the market back in August. Selling the house is not a sudden development where LE had no previous information that they were considering moving. For all we know LE knew as soon as the buyers, sellers and the RE agent came to an agreement.
I do wonder if the paternity testing results were part of the decision to move? What was the timing of the disclosure of those findings to the 2 who agreed to testing?
If JW was indeed found to not be the father of baby K, then he would have no real need to stay in the area. I don't care what either JW or LM said about him keeping S close to her maternal relatives. He has full custody and make the decisions he feels are best.
Frankly, if I were the custodial parent of a child whose other relatives were massacred in the night, I would get that child as far away from the area as I could. Away from potential danger, but also away from the chatter -- no child needs to hear people talking about your mom's murder everywhere you go. I do not thing S is in any danger and being out of the immediate area is probably a good thing for her.
I hope for S's sake that JW had no involvement in the killings. I don't know if I believe that or not, but there is currently no publicly known proof of his guilt despite the recent searches and hoopla. The law states clearly "innocent until proven guilty".