It's ok if we disagree.
I think it's possible some kind of tools were used in some cases to open back doors or windows. IIRC, the quotes about no signs of forced entry came from LM. They may or may not be accurate. LE may have told him that in hopes of scaring him or his family into admitting complicity. As many of us have ascertained, LE probably erroneously focused on other family members in the beginning.
Yes, burner phones would possibly have been used and disposed of. I'm basing my opinion about the killers on similar murders in the area:
Candace Newsome & her daughter
http://wchstv.com/news/local/police-release-names-of-mother-daughter-found-dead-in-scioto-county
http://www.nbc4i.com/news/politics/...amily-who-lost-mother-and-daughter/1114371092
Dr. Kevin Lake
http://www.dispatch.com/news/20170926/who-fatally-shot-pill-mill-doctor-in-his-new-albany-area-home
There's also the similarities with the deaths of the Eapmons in KY
Recall, the bedroom window at CR1's trailer was open that morning.
Putting cell phones, clothing and other evidence in a fire is risky. Unless the killers are able to generate a high temp fire and supervise the burning closely, parts of clothing and cell phones would likely remain. JMO. Yes, I know the local gentry are probably skilled at building bonfires for wiener roasts, etc. It doesn't make first time mass murderers experts at getting rid of all the evidence.
But I do think they may have kept the red truck as a way to later set up JM. I still can't figure out why LE didn't go after the owner of that truck sometime in the year before it was sold to JM. There's so much that LE does and doesn't do about this case that makes no sense at all.
I know LM said it , but the mention of no forced entry was mentioned here as well.
Authorities have said from the very first press conference the killings were methodically planned, taking place in the dark of night while many of the victims slept. The killers stole past several dogs on the properties and there were no signs of forced entry.
Perhaps thats just clever wording on behalf of Chris Graves though. Im not sure.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cincinnati.com/amp/94294522
In regards to the The Eapman murders, Ive read about that case several times. There are eery similarities -the killer being familiar with the house, killing two adults in their sleep (one considered the target).
However there was a 12 year old left alive. But in the Rhoden murders, a 16 year old was murdered. Both of those kids were in the homes of their parents when shot.
If theyre related, why leave a 12 year old alive but kill a 16 year old in another homicide?
Doug Eapman was also involved prior in interstate pill trafficking. LE said he was selling drugs again.
Candy Newsome was said to be dealing pills as well.
LE has never stated the Rhodens were selling drugs. What they did say about a organized grows, they later said they didnt believe was related to the murders.
IMO-selling pills is a lot different than growing weed. The two things are as different as night and day.
So, I guess where Im coming from, IF all of these cases are related, then IMO the Rhodens wouldve been handling more things than marijuana.
And how do the 4 Ws come into play with all of that? I mean, I have seen accounts of certain situations involving the elders horses and what they were said to be used for at one time, but I dont know that to be fact. And thats not the 4 Ws with a laser focus on them.
As far as being an expert bonfire builder, I really dont think thats a factor. Wood burns slow, clothes burn to nothing very quick.
While we are on the subject, anyone know when trash day was for the Ws? Did they have local trash service? I mean if they werent looked at for a year, heck they couldve thrown any evidence away. Its not like LE would find it in a landfill, especially this late in the game.
Im truly not disagreeing. I take no offense to different opinions and thoughts. I actually think thats a good thing-it keeps this case talked about. Guests viewing are more likely to read an open ws thread with conversations that are ongoing, rather than old threads and it keeps the most recent thread at the top of google searches.
One more question, for anyone really, Im headed back to read the autopsy reports again, but wasnt it only CRsr & GR that didnt have the mention of a toe tag? Could it be because they had shoes on at the time their bodys were found?