Well she was addressing someone saying they didn't need someone in that role. They said just load it in the car, drive up.to Detroit and start selling to customers.
End customers?
Well she was addressing someone saying they didn't need someone in that role. They said just load it in the car, drive up.to Detroit and start selling to customers.
I've never heard them say that. I have heard them say "no comment" quite often and the number 200 thrown around a lot. But I've not seen anything in print or at the presser where the specifically said they found outdoor grow sites. Only the number of grow ops. It's just too early to have grow sites outdoors in Ohio. That doesn't mean they couldn't have had more plants at the 2 more indoor sites. I'm not limiting them to 200, but it's just not feasible to have plants outdoors right now unless you have a way to cover them and that would be very conspicuous, even more so than beautiful greenery seen from the sky. I just disagree that there were outdoor grow sites. You're welcome to disagree with me. I'll have to see them to believe they exist.It was at the presser, during the scrum. They have also said numerous times there are 3 ops, two outside one inside.
Wait..
Why can you not say what you think about his demeanor in an interview? How is that a problem?
It amazes me how many people in the R family and others have more than one FB page.
I've never heard them say that. I have heard them say "no comment" quite often and the number 200 thrown around a lot. But I've not seen anything in print or at the presser where the specifically said they found outdoor grow sites. Only the number of grow ops. It's just too early to have grow sites outdoors in Ohio. That doesn't mean they couldn't have had more plants at the 2 more indoor sites. I'm not limiting them to 200, but it's just not feasible to have plants outdoors right now unless you have a way to cover them and that would be very conspicuous, even more so than beautiful greenery seen from the sky. I just disagree that there were outdoor grow sites. You're welcome to disagree with me. I'll have to see them to believe they exist.
I just saw assessed value and yearly tax amount.You can get some info from the auditors site. However to see actual deeds and track history you have to go to the recorders site and I am on my phone currently and don't have access to it right now. I will find it later. You can google it though and have to go through a few clicks to get there. The recorders site is where you can see the actual deeds and names of all the people and who actually owns the et al properties.
He was working third shift the night of the murders and has a rock hard alibi. LE has ruled him out and we shouldn't sleuth him.
this is not the first time i've thought of it. an angry family member?That isn't the issue at all. It is becoming things that have big problems.
Maybe they were killed over the Queen of England.
I expect theories to go through critical thinking on this site. My biggest red flag is knowing you went to this after reading the fake post on that site. You mentioned that.
End customers?
the scenario you just postulated is the one that fits the facts (as we know them) best.
all of the talk of gangs and detroit and mexicans and car envy, none of those explain why those dogs didn't attack the gunman.
the gunman was family. thats why. and not just any family. he was spend the night family.
a cranked up angry family member
the pot operation as a motive makes no sense (from a gang violence perspective) because the gang lost a ton of $$$ when this murder happened- UNLESS they were informants (LE wouldn't want us to know that, because the obvious question would be WHY DIDN'T YOU PROTECT YOUR INFORMANTS)- and even then, explain why the dogs didn't react and why they weren't locked out.
i don't find your scenario far fetched AT ALL. its certainly less far fetched than some of the gang scenario CSI jacked up crap i've read on this thread. JMHO
the easiest answer is usually the right one.
No the one working third shift was the one who threatened CRj and whole family on facebook post. The held at gun point was IJ who had also had some disagreement on SM with CRj but I believe racial type stuff
If LE know who did it yet are choosing not to make an arrest, that is pretty reckless. Not to mention cruel to locals who are probably not sleeping very well.
the scenario you just postulated is the one that fits the facts (as we know them) best.
all of the talk of gangs and detroit and mexicans and car envy, none of those explain why those dogs didn't attack the gunman.
the gunman was family. thats why. and not just any family. he was spend the night family.
a cranked up angry family member
the pot operation as a motive makes no sense (from a gang violence perspective) because the gang lost a ton of $$$ when this murder happened- UNLESS they were informants (LE wouldn't want us to know that, because the obvious question would be WHY DIDN'T YOU PROTECT YOUR INFORMANTS)- and even then, explain why the dogs didn't react and why they weren't locked out.
i don't find your scenario far fetched AT ALL. its certainly less far fetched than some of the gang scenario CSI jacked up crap i've read on this thread. JMHO
the easiest answer is usually the right one.
I just gave you the link and many of us heard it. It was in the scrum at the end of the presser. You had to be watching the presser on line and not shut it off.I've never heard them say that. I have heard them say "no comment" quite often and the number 200 thrown around a lot. But I've not seen anything in print or at the presser where the specifically said they found outdoor grow sites. Only the number of grow ops. It's just too early to have grow sites outdoors in Ohio. That doesn't mean they couldn't have had more plants at the 2 more indoor sites. I'm not limiting them to 200, but it's just not feasible to have plants outdoors right now unless you have a way to cover them and that would be very conspicuous, even more so than beautiful greenery seen from the sky. I just disagree that there were outdoor grow sites. You're welcome to disagree with me. I'll have to see them to believe they exist.
Isaiah Jones, from what I've read he is not a minor. He is listed on the front page of every thread and in the case info. He was never named a suspect but they have never publicly cleared him either.I am confused. Who has been detained at gunpoint?
It is possible an angry family member, there are hundreds of family members.this is not the first time i've thought of it. an angry family member?
that is an actual working theory. the first suspects to rule out are the first ones on the scene.