GoingByMyGut
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2013
- Messages
- 1,173
- Reaction score
- 17
BBM: I don't recall stun guns being that common or readily available in 1980 and prior, even tho they were manufactured before then. We did not even have them on our (LE) dept in 1980.
Bill's clothing would have prevented a stun gun to be effective.
The stun gun's electrodes would have had to had contact with his skin/body to be effective.
Using it thru clothing (coat, shirt, etc) would leave a arc trace or burn/melt (depending on the material), which is can be easily overlooked.
Using it on one's body would also leave a very thin-line arc path (burn), again, often easily overlooked, but visible on thorough detailed examinations.
Thanks, Methodical. I was pretty sure you'd know. The Wikipedia source says that the early ones used gunpowder (inside the wires, I think) and so were classed as firearms. It's possible that it's not until the design was modified, which I think was 1983, that they became declassified and more widely used. Still, you never know what a perp may get their hands on, but I didn't think of the burning of the clothes.