On the 6th of July OSBI director says that he's certain that Hart is guilty cause they have many evidences pointing at his guilt.OSBI director says that he's certain that Hart is guilty cause they have many evidences pointing at his guilt.
They didn't have any evidence pointing specifically at him at the time. He was a fugitive, rapist and great suspect, but that's not enough to talk about certain guilt.
It is in timeline on girlscoutsmurders.com.
Also - there is something shady with these pictures found in sleeping bags with bodies. Some sources are saying that there was photos of his previous victims. More reliable are saying that pictures were found in the cave along with other items. Some other that photos mysteriously appear later and that squirrel hunters weren't recalling seeing them previously.
Do you have a link for the OSBI director's quote? I'm reading through some articles right now that say they consider him a suspect and want to question him.
An article at this link, titled "Weaver Rips Claim About Hart Relatives" from June 26 ends with a quote from Mayes Co DA Sid Wise: "First we're going to catch Mr. Hart, and then we're going to determine to our satisfaction whether he killed the girls. And if not, we'll look for someone else".
http://nebula.wsimg.com/268fe02f72f...4109980B88DCD7256&disposition=0&alloworigin=1
Quite a few locals quoted in the article ask the same question: "If Hart is innocent of the murders, he should turn himself in and be questioned." Hart never did that. Now, his defenders may claim that, because he's a Native American, he wouldn't get fair treatment, but if you read many of the news articles of the time, quite a few suspects who were arrested and/or questioned at the time were also Native Americans. They were questioned and released, no problems.
Hart didn't want to turn himself in because he knew he would go back to prison for a long time. He had kidnapped and brutally raped two women. When on parole, he had committed a string of armed burglaries and was put back in jail, where he escaped twice. He should have turned himself in and truthfully answered questions if he was innocent.
Here's a link to an article written 30 days after the murders that has a pretty good timeline. Note, there are quite a few inaccuracies and inconsistencies that were ironed out later. Some bad reporting, some because of rumors and some because of leaked bad info by different LE officers.
http://nebula.wsimg.com/33a8421b93c...4109980B88DCD7256&disposition=0&alloworigin=1
In the timeline, there's a quote from the OSBI Director from July 6. That was the date when autopsy reports were released revealing two of the girls were raped. (Preliminary autopsy results had been released earlier, before lab tests were done. They reported 2 of the girls appeared to have been raped, but, because lab work hadn't been done, there was no proof. This led to the false rumors that the girls had been raped by women.)
At his press conference, Laird says:
"I would not say with certainty that Hart is guilty, because I would not say with certainty that any person who has not been tried is guilty, but we have a great lot of evidence in this case that points to his guilt."