Why is the Eufala number a mystery/unknown? Timeline says he called the number. So they knew the number but couldn't find who owned it? How is that possible?
Quoting this because I've seen this question asked several times but haven't seen any answer to this. I've been wondering the same thing for a long time and the only possible theory I have seen thrown out was that the number could possibly belong to a disposable phone that was no longer in use by the time the phone records were obtained/checked. Does anyone have any more information on this mystery number or why the identity of the person remains unknown?
I have three thoughts on it, only two serving as any type of explanation for the continued unknown identity.
1. I worked for a seasonal job in which the employer provided a temporary phone from T-Mobile for a few months. I received countless calls from people asking for multiple different people. I assumed the phone number was locked to the phone I was using and the callers were seeking people who previously had my phone. My boss seemed to be under the impression that that was not necessarily the case and that numbers from temporary phones were sold from provider to provider as necessary. I really don't know much about it, but it makes me wonder whether the mystery number is now registered to a new owner or whether it is no longer in service at all? I don't know whether the answer to that question would help answer any other questions about how the identity remains unknown or not. Anyone have any more knowledge about this than I do?
2. Mitch, I have to admit that I'm skeptical of the WPP angle, but this still unknown caller seems like it could possibly fit into your theory in some way. You're clearly more knowledgeable of WPP than I, so I'm interested on whether this could be communication related to WPP that has intentionally been made untraceable in one way or another?
3. I am wondering what "unknown" really means. Do we know that LE has been unable to identify the call recipient? If we don't know that for sure, it seems possible that LE was able to obtain this information but did not release it to the public for some reason. My first thought is that it was someone cleared of any involvement and/or clearly uninvolved in the rest of the Jamison narrative, so LE didn't want to drag that person's name into this all. If this case were less cold from the very beginning, I would think that police were keeping that information close because they did suspect involvement. I don't think that's the case here, especially at this point in the investigation.
Does ANYONE here know anything that explains the mystery number? I can't recall any theories discussed previously, aside from the disposable phone angle. It seems like this number could be either completely unimportant and a waste of attention OR a crucial piece in the puzzle, particularly if the person is actually unknown to everyone, including LE, and therefore may have information about the Jamison's last days that no one else has been able to provide.
Sent from my iPhone using
Tapatalk
