KaaBoom
`·.¸¸ ><((((º> ...·´`·.¸¸ ><((((º>...·
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2012
- Messages
- 4,957
- Reaction score
- 3,199
I'm confused. The father and son did their jail time for the fires. So why do they have to go back.
I thought the judge gave them a fair sentence at first. So why did someone take offense and made it personal to advocate that the judge was too lenient and didn't rightfully sentence them?
Was the original judge a friend of theirs or something? Because not too many people will force the system to give longer sentences after it was all said and done. Jmo
Federal law requires a mandatory five year sentence. The judge did not give them a fair or even a legal sentence.