John/Jane Doe
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2021
- Messages
- 4,406
- Reaction score
- 8,281
What does that article say?
''UNION COUNTY — The Oregon State Police are turning up the heat on a local cold case.What does that article say?
I can’t access it as I’m not in the US but in the EU.
No one knows what she looks like. It's a reconstruction based on a photo of the skull. The skull was cremated, so it's not even a clay model.What phenotype do you think she looks like?
I'm definitely getting Southeast European or Ashkenazi vibes.
Someone said that she facially reminded them of their male Jewish-American friend.
Exactly. And that's a huge thing to not have documented it with at least a photograph. Why is there nothing to support this ME's reporting on several identifying key factors. Firstly, the x-ray and fcjd teeth totally match up. Every shape, angle and gap totally line up. Every tooth listed by ME on his list of fcjd is just as the x-ray clearly shows and Dane, with the exception of the upper right third molar. And that's already been explained since that's the likely tooth to be extracted and the reason this x-ray exists. And it's also clear the ME was confused on his own written note by stating unless Patty had only 3 third molars removed when fcjd clearly still had 3 third molars. Okay, he references seeing a note that Patty had all her third molars removed, where's that more? Who have him that note? Why is it not included in the report? Why was there no photo evidence of this alleged near full term baby?There is very limited evidence to support the gestation of FCJDs pregnancy. No measurements of the fetal bones, no xrays, no photos.
There is very limited evidence to support the gestation of FCJDs pregnancy. No measurements of the fetal bones, no xrays, no photos.
I am now 100% convinced, without any doubt whatsoever, that this is Patty Otto. From the first time I viewed photos of the picture of the skull and saw her teeth, I was nearly positive at that instance. Which is what pulled me in and do whatever I can to help.So when we are in a situation like this, we have to remain cautiously optimistic. We have to remember that the FCJD “dentals” only consist of a handwritten chart, no physical X-Rays. Patty has physical X-rays. Both individuals had a silver filling in tooth #30 and #31. With a consultation with three other dentists and Patty’s daughter recently, the teeth do line up tooth to tooth based on the photos and the x-rays compared (the images are too graphic to share).
But again, we still remain cautiously optimistic. In the meantime, however, we still field other tips and look into them as best as we can. We do not leave any stone unturned.
@Patty's Voice, can I post the impositions?I like big picture reliance. The clothing match is easily the most significant variable I see, far beyond dentals. That's especially true because it is two pieces of clothing, not one, with each as color match, and described in newspaper print days after the disappearance.
This is a red and white case.
The decomposition estimate could not be more meaningless. We've seen countless cases in which the body has later been identified and none of the estimates were even close, regardless of whether they were done early or much later. Nature can do that. I'm surprised the experts still cling to it. But I guess their expertise aligns with stubbornness.
They already have seen it. A small piece of what Suzanne presented to OSP in the reopening of fcjd case. And removing Patty from exclusions list.Go ahead and message LE about that if you can, they'd really benefit from this.
FCJD is Patty Otto!
It's a video comparing Jane doe's teeth to Patty Otto's dental xrays by using transparent overlays. I think the UP's teeth are the exact same as Patty's.What is this? All I get is an error.