...that's not proof he shot her on purpose......nothing can be proved either one way or the other.....it's all speculation....
The arterial bleeding proves Reeva was killed only a few minutes before being carried downstairs - and that Reeva was screaming until the last bullet hit her, which was always the only credible scenario with what the witnesses heard anyway.
The pause shows the bullets were fired and aimed purposely.
The duvet and fan position shows Pistorius version was a lie. The police could not have changed only those elements in the room that would make his version possible. The Stipps saw the light on, otherwise they wouldn't have known which house to look at, so he wasn't in the bathroom tackling an intruder in the dark.
None of this is speculation, it is overwhelming proof. And if you need more, just look at his own testimony - the lies, the tailoring between bail and trial, the tailoring between eic and cross, from one day to the next, his failed PPD, and the massive unlikelihood that a dangerous armed person would hide, that he would scream out to let them know he was there, and that he would approach danger on his stumps, not ask Reeva to call security instead of the police, hide his phone from police...there's just too much.
Juries convict on far less evidence, particularly when there is no good reason for him to lie and when he denied every single charge brought against him when his guilt was obvious, and when he asked a friend to take the blame for a shot he fired, because he will not take responsibility for anything.
You have to weigh up the reasonableness of what he asks you to believe - and there is none. He was not living in fear of intruders. His defence was won by creating a false timeline and a judge who did not check the records - we have checked it out and know that it is a lie.