No idea. It means nothing.
I'm more interested in a witness who made a mistake in identifying an anxious woman's voice.
At the time and now I am still stunned that this does not introduce doubt into peoples minds as to what ear witnesses thought they heard.
The defences timeline is distorted. They got lucky in that Masipa bought it and disregarded without explanation a whole raft of evidence.
The mosaic fits so much better.
That's why people are resolute in their conviction. Just as you cannot see any reason to doubt OP's story. Do not be astounded at us for what you do yourself.
You may feel that Masipas verdict backs you up so you back her decisions to the hilt where after much discussion we see them as badly flawed. Simple really.