19s ago
14:01
Nel says the finding that Pistorius did not specifically intend to kill Steenkamp is not a mitigating factor. He says if an offender sets off a bomb that kills 50 people, it does not matter that he does not know the identities of those 50 people.
He is guilty of the murder of Reeva. He killed her.
Believing he was shooting at an intruder is not a mitigating factor, Nel insists:
The identity of the victim is irrelevant to his guilt and irrelevant to sentence.
8m ago
13:52
Nel: 'Reeva can never walk in court'
It is fair for the court to take the accused’s personal circumstances into account, Nel says. But in this case, this “recedes into the background” compared with the seriousness of the offence.
Reeva Steenkamp “disappeared” in this trial, he says. The court should take into account “who she was … what dreams she had”.
She is just as important as the personal circumstances of the accused … She can never walk in court.
It doesn’t matter if Pistorius thought he was firing at an intruder, Nel goes on:
Is an intruder’s life not important? Did he think of that life?
Pistorius’ actions were gratuitous, Nel tells the judge:
I cannot think of a more excessive use of a firearm … He fired four shots that tore up the body of the deceased.