Rest in peace, Caylee.
Someone in LE with experience in psychology and giving bad news to victims' families needs to sit down with Cindy and George and try to make them understand that their granddaughter is dead. Until they believe it, even the remote possibility of getting Casey to open up about the location of Caylee's body is hopeless.
On the live cam thread, everyone saw a car pull up and a guy go into the house shortly before the news broke. Maybe he was there to break the news? And maybe they got the news days ago? IMOO
I read this as in the background I'm listening to Lee's interview today as he rambles on and on regarding who has Caylee at this time.
What will it take for this family to wake up?
I'm glad it's official and released by the OSCO. Now there's no doubt and we can find her.
I don't get it. NONE of the other local affiliates have this info on their websites, local fox is not reporting it on their 5pm broadcast, Sentinel, nada and I cant find it on any of cnn, foxnews, or msnbc. THIS is the story that has captured the nation and there's no mention of official confirmation? This should be breaking news. Help me understand.
Rest in peace, Caylee.
Someone in LE with experience in psychology and giving bad news to victims' families needs to sit down with Cindy and George and try to make them understand that their granddaughter is dead. Until they believe it, even the remote possibility of getting Casey to open up about the location of Caylee's body is hopeless.
With the many protesters who were outside the Anthony's house, I think it's a good possibility you're right. Many did question the timing of the 'economic crimes' charges.Do we know if the Anthony's were officially notified prior to the public? I'm guessing that Casey was re-arrested for her protection before this came out.
Lee gave an interview today?
OKay, this is what I am not understanding now...
Now that they have these results, why even offer her limited immunity? I understand the need to find Caylee's body, yet we know she will not talk.
If I am understanding, the limited imunnity requires her to lead to the body, and they will use only the evidence found in court and not what she tells them correct? This would insure them that she would be convicted on at least 2nd degree right?
But, if she refuses the immunity, then they would have to take their chances on the conviction?
Am I guessing this right?
As an aside, they quoted Cindy but I think it was in the context of the paragraph below and the rearrest. before we go crazy, I think Cindy's comment about wanting the apology is regarding the rearrest. because the quote matches the subesquent information.
Does anyone esle read it that way and see some poor editing?