inmyhumbleopinion
#NeverGivingUp
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2013
- Messages
- 5,336
- Reaction score
- 32,720
.@BucksDa: I asked you at the beginning, what is the worst thing you can concieve if doing to a child. Now you know the answer.
10:48 AM 3/26/19
.@BucksDa: He sadistically acted out his rape murder fantasy on this little girl.
.@BucksDa, arguing against defense experts. Says they found Sullivan to be “hyper-sexual” and “filled with anger and rage. Weintraub says that makes him “a madman who loves to have sex.”
.@BucksDa: Sullivan took Viagra in order to rape the 14 year old. Intent to harm, “Most people would take that as a sign not to do it, but he was determined.”
.@BucksDa points to Sullivan’s confession where he admits he had this fantasy for 6 weeks before the murder.
@BucksDa: Grace Packer was not a disposable child, Grace Packer was loved. She was adored. The sky was the limit for her.
.@BucksDa: Sullivan was her father figure, responsible for nututing [nuturing] her. Instead he murdered her purely for her pleasure.
.@BucksDa: he made her last 12 hours hell on earth. Ended with quote from Col. Kurtz in Apocalypse Now: “the horror. The horror.”
Defense attorney Jack Fagan: “would we be here if my client didn’t confess?” says that confession should be given significant weight toward life in prison rather than death.
Defense attorney Jack Fagan: Sullivan’s confession led directly to Sara Packer’s arrest and to her pending guilty plea as he says prior to confession there wasn’t enough to arrest her. Should tilt them toward life w/o parole rather than death.
Defense attorney Jack Fagan argues Sara Packer manipulated Sullivan into the murder, much like she manipulated the foster program Impact Services to give her children even after others had complained. Says manipulation should tilt jury toward life w/o parole rather than life.
Defense attorney Jack Fagan: Sara Packer convinced my client Grace Packer was a non-entity. No question he should have left, but in terms of sentencing, she controlled him and that should sway jurors to life w/o parole rather than death.
Defense attorney Jack Fagan says he isn’t asking jurors to go hug his client or to feel sympathy for him, but says his arguments, considered together, should have them choosing life w/o parole rather than death.
12:11 PM
All reported by Jim Melwert (@JMelwert) | Twitter
10:48 AM 3/26/19
.@BucksDa: He sadistically acted out his rape murder fantasy on this little girl.
.@BucksDa, arguing against defense experts. Says they found Sullivan to be “hyper-sexual” and “filled with anger and rage. Weintraub says that makes him “a madman who loves to have sex.”
.@BucksDa: Sullivan took Viagra in order to rape the 14 year old. Intent to harm, “Most people would take that as a sign not to do it, but he was determined.”
.@BucksDa points to Sullivan’s confession where he admits he had this fantasy for 6 weeks before the murder.
@BucksDa: Grace Packer was not a disposable child, Grace Packer was loved. She was adored. The sky was the limit for her.
.@BucksDa: Sullivan was her father figure, responsible for nututing [nuturing] her. Instead he murdered her purely for her pleasure.
.@BucksDa: he made her last 12 hours hell on earth. Ended with quote from Col. Kurtz in Apocalypse Now: “the horror. The horror.”
Defense attorney Jack Fagan: “would we be here if my client didn’t confess?” says that confession should be given significant weight toward life in prison rather than death.
Defense attorney Jack Fagan: Sullivan’s confession led directly to Sara Packer’s arrest and to her pending guilty plea as he says prior to confession there wasn’t enough to arrest her. Should tilt them toward life w/o parole rather than death.
Defense attorney Jack Fagan argues Sara Packer manipulated Sullivan into the murder, much like she manipulated the foster program Impact Services to give her children even after others had complained. Says manipulation should tilt jury toward life w/o parole rather than life.
Defense attorney Jack Fagan: Sara Packer convinced my client Grace Packer was a non-entity. No question he should have left, but in terms of sentencing, she controlled him and that should sway jurors to life w/o parole rather than death.
Defense attorney Jack Fagan says he isn’t asking jurors to go hug his client or to feel sympathy for him, but says his arguments, considered together, should have them choosing life w/o parole rather than death.
12:11 PM
All reported by Jim Melwert (@JMelwert) | Twitter