The CD was introduced in 1982. The USB flash drive was introduced in 2000. While both were available, I am not aware of what RFG's laptop had in the way of drives and USB ports. It has been reported to be an "older" computer. I doubt small rural counties had cutting edge hardware and software. I am really starting to wonder if RFG was tossing more than just the laptop and hard drive. It is possible that evidence is spread around in different water features in the region. Spring Creek is very close...runs thru town. Foster Joseph Sayers lake is a short drive as is Colyer lake. All closer than Raystown and Lewisburg. So there are two threads to tug at here. Why drive so far to Raytstown and Lewisburg when other suitable water features were available? That goes to distance from Bellefonte as well as destruction, and that keeps bringing me back to what in the heck was so sensitive on that laptop. To me we have deception (distance and outright lying to PF if what we know about the phone call is true), destruction of County owned property (a crime in itself, albeit a minor one, but odd for an officer of the legal system) and destruction of as yet unknown electronic information. None of this paints a pretty picture, even if "others" were not involved. Ask yourself, what rises to this level?
The distance could be because RFG did not want associated with him.
I'll give you a scenario:
RFG wants to destroy the data on the laptop by destroying the laptop; he was planning to return home after doing it. When he retires, he reports it lost and reimburses the county (which would not be more than $200-$400).
He plans to toss it in Raystown Lake, but he runs into someone he knows and/or can't a boat. He returns to the office, a bit annoyed, and forcefully closes the door to his office, whenever going in and out. JKA hears this.
The next day, he goes to another spot, Lewisburg, and disposes of the laptop.
Why does he do this? Well, because it won't be tied to him directly. If someone finds it, they may just toss back in the water. If RFG is sitting in his office in July, when the laptop was found, he just says that somebody must have picked it up after he lost it. Nobody would be looking for the hard drive.
Sure, it is possible that RFG was looking at something nasty on the computer, but it is just as possible he had financial data, or even employee information that he wasn't comfortable about possibly being discovered. He didn't give out personal information, so it could be stuff that we would not have a problem revealing ourselves.
The laptop did have a CD drive. Though we have no way of knowing, everything that was on his laptop
might have been transferred to his home computer
One of the differences is that RFG could not have had a set time to be at Raystown Lake. He could not have known when the Prison Board Meeting would end.