J. J. in Phila
Verified Insider
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2008
- Messages
- 8,475
- Reaction score
- 3,921
I'm guessing that the second witness contacted the PSP or BPD. I'm told that he was not from the Wilkes-Barre area (and not from Centre County) and that he would be the type to have MEGA-credibility. I've heard, second hand of the account, and it would fit with someone trying to somewhat disguise his identity. They talked for about 5 minutes, so it wasn't just walking past the guy on a street.
Now, we have two witnesses that put Mr. Gricar in the same place, a bar in Wilkes-Barre, at the same time, the evening of 4/18/05. Both are sure and both got more than a fleeting glimpse of him. Both may have identified his voice. While the bartender is probably credible, the second witness has major credibility, on a number of levels. This is what would move my numbers.
Detective: Gricar researched how to destroy hard drive
By Sara Ganim
BELLEFONTE Before he disappeared April 15, 2005, former District Attorney Ray Gricar used his home computer to search the Internet for information on how to wreck a hard drive, how to fry a hard drive, and water damage to a notebook computer.
Ray Gricar's laptop computer at the Bellefonte Police Department on August 1, 2005. The computer was found missing the hard drive.
Tuesday, one day before the fourth anniversary of Gricars disappearance, Bellefonte Police Det. Matthew Rickard released information that raises the question as to why Gricar might have wanted to destroy that hard drive.
Gricar, who was planning to retire in eight months, went for a drive through Brush Valley, toward Lewisburg, on April 15, 2005, and hasnt been heard from since.
What was believed to be his county-issued laptop computer hard drive was found in the Susquehanna River six months after he disappeared, separated from the computer itself, which was also found in the river.
Two FBI labs and Kroll Ontrack, a company that was able to recover data from hard drives on board Space Shuttle Columbia after it crashed, both evaluated the hard drive, but both attempts to recover information were unsuccessful.
The water damage from the Susquehanna River was too much.
More at link:
http://www.centredaily.com/news/local/story/1228044.html
Maybe, the Montour County DA is right -- maybe he was looking to erase the very info that was the cause of his disappearance (ie, the foul play scenario).
And, if he set up his disappearance, it would have taken months (if not years) of advance planning. Yet, there has been absolutely NOT one shred of evidence pointing to that.
Four years later, still a mystery. But, the latest press release has not changed my mind. I still think he was the victim of foul play, possibly because of a drug case he was working on with the joint task force.
I hat to disagree with Bob Buehner, but how on earth could a criminal have known that data was only on the laptop? How would he know where the laptop was?
In the case of long term things:
1. Mr. Gricar had a long term interest in the 1985 voluntary disappearance of Ohio police chief Mel Wiley. He was discussing the case, with which he had no personal involvement, at least eight years after it happened.
2. He had expressed an interest in erasing the drive 16 months prior to his disappearance.
3. He had registered the Mini Cooper in his girlfriend's name about 9 months before he disappeared.