I am sort of familiar with this case since I watched a program on it. I only state my opinions and I'm never 100% sure. BUT...
I'm not sure if I truly believe the hit on the car to be as accurate as stated. At first I did, but since there is room for error I'm not sure I can rely on what I believed before. But let's say it was Tonis car that got the hit. This means that she or someone else was driving her car or she was with someone else and they were both in her car. If Toni was harmed, the person who could have harmed her was driving around in her car- maybe trying to figure out the next plan in disposing of the car. I don't really feel that sticking the license plate on another car or a stolen car a very wise thing to do because that would provide room for suspicion if that person were to get pulled over and questioned and tags run. Knowing the license plate didn't match the model of the car. And if someone harmed Toni, I guess the cell phone would be turned off. Unless Toni turned her cell phone off or it died after she got done texting her daughter and then she met with foul play later never having the chance to turn on her cell phone again. I doubt Toni would have brought her phone charger to a party so that could leave room that her phone just died and she didn't bother getting another phone charger. Do they actually have the cell phone pings and are not just releasing the information that was found out? Or did the ping stop right after the texting to her daughter? What did she say to her daughter in the text..is this known? I want to believe so much and know for sure that it was her car that got the hit. Because then that leaves room for figuring out what happened. Maybe Toni just decided to turn her phone off so that she couldn't be found. I'm sure she was very angry but not angry enough to text her daughter and then afterward she just turned off her cell phone so she wouldn't be found. I just find it odd that she would text her daughter in a time when she was obviously in a terrible state of mind. Maybe someone else texted her daughter and if so, why? This person would have to know Toni and her daughter. I can understand her texting her daughter out of love but from the sounds of her state of mind I don't know how she could have thought about doing that after throwing furniture around.
There have been a lot of people who have been blaming the friend of Toni for her disappearance and that she hasn't been telling the whole story. Didn't the friend take a lie detector test and pass? Because I think she was concerned that so many people were looking at her as a suspect. I don't think the friend did anything just because when she spoke I just felt through her words that she was truly baffled as to what happened to her friend. On the other hand, I don't agree that her friend didn't really care if Toni drank knowing she was on medication. Maybe Toni drank because she wanted to feel like she was a normal person who could do anything. She could have felt bad having to take medication for the rest of her life and just drank thinking it wouldn't affect her mind. I would find it difficult to go to a club and not have a drink yet alone at a party. Even if I was on medication. When I used to smoke, I took a medication at the same time and was told not to smoke but I did it anyway.
What I can't stop thinking about is the strange pattern of Tonis sightings that supposedly occurred, according to Law. Supposedly, for some time sightings were being reported that she was seen in Philly (I THINK) for I think it was a few weeks but then the sightings would stop there and then start in Camden. This pattern was repeated for some type. Does anyone know if this pattern had stopped yet? I can't remember. I believe that the sightings are true just because the pattern of the sightings alone. I think it would be very difficult for people just to make up sightings and have it go in one area and then stop then start in another. It would just be difficult to create that. I thought I heard that the sightings stopped. And if this is true then maybe she was murdered after a while or maybe she left the area or was taken to another area. But then I'm sure more sightings would appear. I think the reason why Law suspected that it was either drugs or trafficking is because of the pattern of the sightings that supposedly happened. But if she was being trafficked, I doubt the people would want her to be seen so much knowing that someone could spot her. This is the only reason why trafficking may not be a possibilty. Then again, she could have been transferred to different people against her will to people in Camden and then back to Philly.
Maybe a reason why Toni was supposedly sighted in a pattern like manner is because she could have had a friend in Camden that she saw in secret every two weeks or so and then she was trailing it back to Philly living there and then living with this friend in Camden. Perhaps a person who was giving her drugs once a couple of weeks. I mean I do this with my boyfriend, not the drug part but the visiting part, since he lives in NJ and I live in PA. The only difference is we text and talk to each other and people have an idea of our plans-especially if my mom wants to know.
Maybe she is doing drugs and is too ashamed to come forward to her family because maybe she doesn't want to be viewed as a failure. An addiction comes with a lot of guilt. Just a thought. I'm sure she knew she wasn't supposed to be drinking while being on medication. And I think if she crashed her car would have been found already. But this theory I'm not inclined to all that much.
If Toni is missing and without medication, then I'm sure she will be unstable making it harder for her to think clearly. Because if she's without a cell phone, no money and I'm guessing not using any credit cards then that raises a red flag that maybe she really was murdered. She could be getting her resources elsewhere or on the down low. People could be helping her who may know if she doesn't want to be found or not.
However, I really hope this poor woman is found.
Anyone have any new information regarding this case?