ScubaTwinn
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2009
- Messages
- 671
- Reaction score
- 3
Of all days, my Sirius says No Antenna Signal Detected. I'm freaking out I won't be able to hear!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you know what's with WAT adding the "h" in his words?? I don't get the inside joke... TIA.
Something has been nagging at the back of mind for a few days now and it finally came to me. I'm curious to know if anyone else has a problem with the following.....
1. Visitors to the County Jail cannot bring things to inmates. Take magazines for example. I could not bring a copy of Vogue to an inmate during a visit. Instead I would have to order the copy and have it sent directly to the jail. Clearly, this policy is in effect to minimize the possibility of contraband, right?
So why was the media allowed to bring make-up to the jail and have it given directly to JA? Shoot, someone could have put cynide in the lip gloss. Sure, a guard could have examined the make-up, but how carefully was that done in such a short period of time? Just doesn't seem right to me.
2. Sure, JA might have a free speech right to conduct those interviews. But why was she given the option of wearing a sweater to cover the cute little stiped outfit? There is nothing in the consitution that says someone has a right to cover up prison stripes. Conduct the inverview if you will, but you are an inmate. Just doesn't seem right to me.
3. JA has been convicted of first degree murder. The question of innocent until proven guilty has been asked and answered. So why was she allowed to sit directly across from multiple reporters without being shackled and handcuffed at ALL times? Whose to say that she couldn't have jumped out of her chair, grabbed the pen out of the reporters hand and stabbed them in the eye????? Those guards would not have been able to subdue her before the damage was done. Again, it just does not seem right to me.
Am I crazy?
MOO
I have shown greater love and care disposing of a Goldfish.
Yes- she will absolutely kill again- in fact I am not certain this was her first kill- maybe first 'human' kill.
We are going to learn much, much more about JAA's past once she is sentenced to death and sent away to death row.
I have shown greater love and care disposing of a Goldfish.
Yes- she will absolutely kill again- in fact I am not certain this was her first kill- maybe first 'human' kill.
We are going to learn much, much more about JAA's past once she is sentenced to death and sent away to death row.
This really bothers me from Ryan Owens interview with CM: He asks "so you think people will be safe with Jodi Arias out of these 4 walls" Her answer "yes, if you don't abuse me or attack me or threaten to kill me, then you're safe."
She will definitely kill again. Also, it is my opinion her answer was a direct threat to Ryan ( like back off) because in her demented mind, Ryan was verbally attacking her. He is a ''hater" you know.
Do you know what's with WAT adding the "h" in his words?? I don't get the inside joke... TIA.
Ah, thank you, makes sense now, because I like Stewie and his "Cool Hwhip" talk, lol! Thanks for explaining, I couldn't figure it out.It's a Family Guy reference to Stewy pronouncing words with an 'h' after the W with a long 'h' sound. ie: Cool Hwhip or Awhile as ahhwhile.
BBM: That was ME !
:twocents:
IF JA does NOT get the Death Penalty it will be a "WIN-WIN" for her and her DT ... and the thought of that is absolutely sickening !
The Alexander Family wants the Death Penalty, and Mr. Martinez asked for the jury to come back with a Verdict of DP ! And I see absolutely NO reason why this jury would be unable to deliver the DP !
While I understand this jury's record is great so far : 12 jurors - 1st Degree PRE-MEDITATED Murder, and 12 jurors - extreme cruelty, they need to come back with the DP because the sentencing of the CM should be equivalent to the horrendous murder she committed !
There were NO mitigating factors, and NOT ONE PERSON -- NOBODY -- spoke on behalf of Travis' murderer, which speaks volumes about the CM, IMO !
The only person to speak on behalf of the convicted murderer was herself -- who has already lied to the jury -- AND -- the jury knows it !
IF JA does not go to Death Row, she will do anything she can to continue to "torture" Travis' memory and Travis' family !
This is just a "no brainer" IMO ...
:moo::moo::moo::moo::moo:
does anyone have the links for watching live tv from the UK?
Thanks
BBM: That was ME !
:twocents:
IF JA does NOT get the Death Penalty it will be a "WIN-WIN" for her and her DT ... and the thought of that is absolutely sickening !
The Alexander Family wants the Death Penalty, and Mr. Martinez asked for the jury to come back with a Verdict of DP ! And I see absolutely NO reason why this jury would be unable to deliver the DP !
While I understand this jury's record is great so far : 12 jurors - 1st Degree PRE-MEDITATED Murder, and 12 jurors - extreme cruelty, they need to come back with the DP because the sentencing of the CM should be equivalent to the horrendous murder she committed !
There were NO mitigating factors, and NOT ONE PERSON -- NOBODY -- spoke on behalf of Travis' murderer, which speaks volumes about the CM, IMO !
The only person to speak on behalf of the convicted murderer was herself -- who has already lied to the jury -- AND -- the jury knows it !
IF JA does not go to Death Row, she will do anything she can to continue to "torture" Travis' memory and Travis' family !
This is just a "no brainer" IMO ...
:moo::moo::moo::moo::moo:
Maybe it's the hhill that makes Wild hhuff and hpuff.Do you know what's with WAT adding the "h" in his words?? I don't get the inside joke... TIA.
Agreed. You make solid points there.The DT seemed to be influenced by inmate Arias and overstepped reasonable moral argument several times, in my opinion - almost 'sociopathic' in their line of argument at times - seen specifically in the cross examination with the Forensic Medical Examiner.On HLN while ago, Dr. Drew said that the jury usually gives the death penalty to serial killers and those that kill little kids. The panel was talking about Jodi only killing one person. Some of the lawyers do not seem to be considering facts such as Jodi driving about a thousand miles to kill Travis, planning the murder for over a week at the very least, staging a burglary to steal her grandfather's gun, cornering Travis in the shower, murdering him in an especially cruel way, etc. They don't seem to realize that she did not only assassinated his character on the witness stand, but she continued to assassinate his character during her allocution and in interviews. Each time she speaks about Travis abusing her, it's like she's sticking that knife into his chest again and twisting it around. These lawyers don't seem to understand that Travis WASN'T her boyfriend at that time either.
On HLN while ago, Dr. Drew said that the jury usually gives the death penalty to serial killers and those that kill little kids. The panel was talking about Jodi only killing one person. Some of the lawyers do not seem to be considering facts such as Jodi driving about a thousand miles to kill Travis, planning the murder for over a week at the very least, staging a burglary to steal her grandfather's gun, cornering Travis in the shower, murdering him in an especially cruel way, etc. They don't seem to realize that she did not only assassinated his character on the witness stand, but she continued to assassinate his character during her allocution and in interviews. Each time she speaks about Travis abusing her, it's like she's sticking that knife into his chest again and twisting it around. These lawyers don't seem to understand that Travis WASN'T her boyfriend at that time either.
Sometimes when JM asks a question it sounds like hwhy/ hwhat etc. That's where it startedDo you know what's with WAT adding the "h" in his words?? I don't get the inside joke... TIA.