AuburnSchnauzer
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2011
- Messages
- 8,782
- Reaction score
- 0
Was that mike kiefer that asked her the hell question! In her interview?:seeya:
No, it was Keifer that posted one of the juror questions yesterday on azcentral.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Was that mike kiefer that asked her the hell question! In her interview?:seeya:
My desktop looks pretty defiant right about now. What does that mean, JC?
Jinkasaurus et al will know by the look in bailiff's eyes when the verdict has been reached. Also reiterated a bit ago how producer Wong (who apparently has amazing body language/mind-reading skills) thinks there is acrimony in the deliberations. :banghead:
Breaking news: "defiant female" and 3 male jurors not talking in line in cafeteria. Maybe because HLN et al are stalking them?
I'm not real worried about this, it's a big decision for those making it I'm sure. Either way, Jodi is convicted of capital murder and is off to the big house.
ETA I see may of us have the stalker angle going re: the jury. And "jury whisperer" :lol:
TD....tisk tisk...you forgot to donate her hair to locks of love... Giver her a hair cut!!:seeya:
Maybe stapler lady should be in charge of Jean and Jane..... just sayin' .
:seeya: I was wondering the same thing : :waitasec: must be her "new dew" ...
Getting close to that Scott Peterson total of 12 hours ...
Yea! Go Oregon!and 9 of those were for Jaywalking. :gasp: DON'T MESS AROUND IN ARIZONA!!!
I can't tolerate Jean C. These people are deciding whether or not to put someone to death. I wouldn't expect them to be hunky dory and all smiles. :facepalm:
I'm thinking that what's holding things up right now is that one or more of the jurors (most likely 1+ of the church-going woman/women as it seemed that it was 2 women that held the murder one charge up for a little bit) is having trouble -personally/morally- having the authority to put someone (albeit a barbaric convicted murderer) to death. In fact, it was probably because of the possibility of having to decide giving DP if a first degree murder conviction was given that initially held those holdouts up (from giving first degree) in the guilty phase. But now that first degree WAS issued and they've advanced on to decide on life or death at this point it's much easier on their conscious to take the easy route out and try and stick with LIP. I think every single one of them (the jurors) knows full well WHAT JA is, WHAT she has done, the lives that she has ruined, that she very much deserves death, and that the DP is the most appropriate punishment in this case but one or more is having a hard time facing the fact of issuing DP (whether it be religious/personal reasons or something other). Well too bad so sad, this/these specific juror(s) should've never been so careless/ignorant as to say that "yes they could impose death if a case warranted it and that it wouldn't be an issue/problem for them in doing so" while they sat in voir dire. I think that they honestly believed back then that it would be rare if this trial would even reach DP, and in this assumption they were naive. Well, now that it IS a DP-qualified case and it was PROVEN without a doubt that the aggravators heavily outweigh the mitigators (if any exists) in this case and that DP is the most appropriate punishment, it's time for them to live up to their own words and what they said that they could do if they were presented with it. And considering that there are at least 2 AZ trials that I know of so far where DP was being decided and the juries in those cases initially were deadlocked/had trouble unifying but came back with DP in both, I'm guessing that it's perfectly normal for some to be dead set against DP at first and then changed their minds with some time. I can only hope that the holdout(s) in this case follow suit.
Thanks for joining my Juanettes DP Kickline, basilcat! You're all invited... NO AUDITION NECESSARY!!!
Chris Hughes said that the Alexanders will accept and respect this jury's decision, no matter what it is. I think the least we all can do is show the same amount of respect and not badmouth them. They've come back with 2 verdicts already.... most importantly First Degree Murder and we were all praising them and showering them with love then. Now that they've deliberated longer than some think they should, backs are being turned on them. I don't get it. Let's not forget, they sat in the courtroom for a month and a 1/2 longer than they were told the trial would last and were subjected to waiting for hours on end on some days and were told they couldn't proceed on some days, all with no explanation. I feel for them. If they need 2 weeks to come to a decision, that's ok with me. Whatever happens, happens. :twocents:
Thanks for joining my Juanettes DP Kickline, basilcat! You're all invited... NO AUDITION NECESSARY!!!
:juanettes::juanettes: