Dewey2Me1MoThyme
Have clue will sleuth!
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2011
- Messages
- 5,004
- Reaction score
- 55
Is it just me or what, because I"m confused as to how an appeals board can possibly know the breadth of a case that was 5 months long? I mean, the jurors have been there day in and day out, they have seen Jodi up close and looked at her and listened to her. So IMO you're right, it would have to be some legal technicality, but even then how can they know the context? For example, if Jodi tries to say the witnesses were threatened....how can the appeals board know Jodi's manipulative ways, and that it could have been Jodi orchestrating these supposed death threats with her "friend" felon Donovan? I'm not understanding how an appeals board can get all of that information? I guess I should ask on the lawyer thread. And as for "ineffective counsel," I mean, is it really ineffective if they're forced to do what Jodi says, and what Jodi says is stupid and dumb? How is that ineffective counsel and how would the appeals board know that context?
Everything that happens inside the walls of the court, or during legal proceedings is documented. A mini trial of sorts would be held to address the item or items in question. From there, if found in the favour of the defendant, then a panel of judges would assess the amount of damage that would have caused to the trial overall. If it was enough to alter the outcome of the trial in the state's favour then a retrial would be ordered. If not, then it would be dismissed on mistrial merits. I hope that clarifies it in a nutshell version.