Can't believe my eyes. He's yawning and being bored in court? Checking a watch he isn't wearing?
He also says that the Ministry of Public Affairs didn't take any reference to the NH case because her body hasn't been found.Según el abogado, la acusación fiscal tiene aspectos a favor del holandés. Uno de ellos es que se menciona que el jugador profesional de póker no tiene antecedentes penales ni en el Perú ni en el extranjero. “Yo pienso que fue por esta razón que no pidió la pena máxima de 35 años, que es lo que está señalado en el Código Penal para homicidio calificado y si él se acoge a la confesión sincera puede recibir solo 25 años de cárcel. Además, si accede a beneficios penitenciarios, que esperemos no se los den, solo pasaría la tercera parte de esta condena en la cárcel”, dijo.
Hey epiphany!! :seeya: NTNS, my friend!
Yup, he's a piece of work, isn't he? I think he's high as a kite, personally.
His days are numbered, though. tick, tock...
i believe i read after he's served his time in peru then he'd go to the US for the extortion charges/wire fraud trial/sentence if the extradition request was successful...
??
They way I understand it is that the 'sincere confession' needs to match the facts and evidence of the case. If they don't, the judges can (and probably will) reject his 'sincere confession' and then it will go to trial where he will get a much stiffer sentence.
A simple murder (crime of passion) does not match the facts and evidence in this case. The blood spatter everywhere shows the brutality. The fact that he used his shirt to strangle her and finish her off after he elbowed her (in the heat of passion?). The emails to friends desperately begging for money just prior to him luring her to his room. The fact that he did, indeed, rob her.
He just trying to decide whether he should gamble on if he can snow these judges. And we all know how he likes to gamble...
MOO
From what I understood, once his sentence is decided in Peru, then the US want him extradited to stand trial for the extortion.
maybe things have changed since i read articles like these below that state the exact opposite lol
Now that there is a Van der Sloot extortion indictment in Alabama Joran Van der Sloot will have to face a trial there. That is assuming he ever gets out of prison in Peru.
http://law.rightpundits.com/?p=1891
Famed criminal defense lawyer Roy Black told ABC's "Good Morning America" that, "The murder case in Peru takes precedence over" the extortion charges, and that the chances of van der Sloot getting extradited to Alabama "are zero."
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Internati...rtion-plot-natalee-holloway/story?id=10824621
That's exactly my understanding Kamille, and IDK, but it kind of doesn't make much sense to me JMHO. Surely extortion charges cannot take prevalence over a murder sentence, so :waitasec: what would determining his sentence for extortion years in advance achieve?From what I understood, once his sentence is decided in Peru, then the US want him extradited to stand trial for the extortion. Once that trial is completed and if found guilty and his sentence is determined he will be returned to Peru to serve out his sentence there and then once that is completed he will be sent back to the US to serve whatever sentence he receives there. It appears as though the US do not want to wait up to 30 years to even start the extortion trial. :waitasec:
MOO
... what would determining his sentence for extortion years in advance achieve?
This was one of the latest ones I read so who knows...
The US authorities are reportedly currently involved in negotiations with the Peruvian government to have Van der Sloot extradited to the US for trial immediately after his trial in Peru ends. He would then be returned to Peru to serve his sentence there before being definitively extradited to the US to serve what is expected to be another long term of imprisonment
http://tswi.org/africa/bulletin/van-der-sloot-trial-starts-friday
You partially got it. pretty obvious what the reasons are, which are not the 'obvious' IYKWIM.plus, what if he died in the peruvian prison or was killed? then the US/State of Alabama would have gone through all that time and expense for nothing really (except of course, a possible conviction merely "on the record").