Police say parents are not answering vital questions #2

[Sherbie]

Well both parties have to agree to settle. I would think if you sue someone and then you settle on some sort of amount, obviously the person/company you were suing thought it was more advantageous to settle on something rather than take their chances and hope the court finds in their favor (where they would pay nothing).

For businesses, it's almost always a cost analysis that determines whether to settle - the likely costs associated with defending the suit vs. the cost of settlement. I've seen many questionable or even outright ridiculous cases settled rather than spending the money to defend them, even when a win was all but certain.

 

[Nixie]

They had an attorney with them on the 6th of OCT. That is the second day, not counting the 4th.

I was wrong, they had an attorney on the 8th. They were interviewed about nine hours on the 6th. Nothing about the 5th was reported. They must have got the attorney on the 6th and went to the next interview with him on the 8th. Anyway pretty darn quick..

I don't think its that quick considering it was JI's sisters professor that was the first to sit in. JI's sister prolly went to him to get some info/talk to him about what happened and he advised her the parents should get an attorney. Its not odd for people in law school to advise others to lawyer up right away especially if its family.

 

[madge]

Wouldn't it make sense that if DI could "remember" talking to the boys and checking on them, then surely she could "remember" checking on Baby Lisa. WHY would she go to the trouble of checking on the boys, all the while BL was sick all evening .. and NOT open the door to check on BL and "remember" checking on her??? It's like she HAD to change the timeline to some earlier time and distance herself from BL for a big chunk of time. Only thing that makes sense is she knew BL was gone BEFORE 10:30 pm and that she had to fix her timeline to make up for NOT having checked on the baby.

If only the Irwins would sit down with LE (WITH THEIR LAWYERS) and get cleared it would answer a lot of questions. I'd go to the end of the earth and beyond for my child. I'd cut off my arms and legs and be electrocuted.

 

[cityslick]

Wouldn't it make sense that if DI could "remember" talking to the boys and checking on them, then surely she could "remember" checking on Baby Lisa. WHY would she go to the trouble of checking on the boys, all the while BL was sick all evening .. and NOT open the door to check on BL and "remember" checking on her??? It's like she HAD to change the timeline to some earlier time and distance herself from BL for a big chunk of time. Only thing that makes sense is she knew BL was gone BEFORE 10:30 pm and that she had to fix her timeline to make up for NOT having checked on the baby.

If only the Irwins would sit down with LE (WITH THEIR LAWYERS) and get cleared it would answer a lot of questions. I'd go to the end of the earth and beyond for my child. I'd cut off my arms and legs and be electrocuted.

How is it possible she would know BL was missing prior to 10:30pm? The boys in that house would've gave up that little tidbit in the interviews they've had with LE.

 

[Donjeta]

I don't buy that because she follows it up with 'there is no way anyone could have got in' which I take to mean there is no way anyone could take BL prior to 10:30pm. She purposely tries to close the door on an abduction happening prior to 10:30pm. From that interview:

“So, it’s possible you did not check on her before you went to bed at 10:30?”
DB: “Yeah. Yeah. But there’s no way that anybody could have got in.”

It's an excuse why it's okay that she changed Lisa's timeline for four hours. So I lied or was mistaken or confused or blacked out and didn't see her at 10:30 after all. But it doesn't matter because no one could have got in when they were sitting on the front steps.

Could someone have got out through the back?

It is now really bothering me that we've heard so little about all the other entrances.

I was under the impression that there was just this front door that the intruder could have used, or one of the windows, and I had somehow got the notion that the garage was separate from the house. I don't know why. But if there is an entryway to the house through the garage it changes things a lot. If there is a teen with the access code there could be a number of other people with the access code. The people on the front yard wouldn't have seen a person entering or exiting through the back of the house. If the children were dozing they might not have seen anything either.

But all the talk is about the window and the front door.

 

[Donjeta]

How is it possible she would know BL was missing prior to 10:30pm? The boys in that house would've gave up that little tidbit in the interviews they've had with LE.

When I think about my 9 year old I think he might not have noticed a baby sibling missing unless there was a commotion about it. If told that the baby was asleep behind closed doors and watching a movie he would probably never have thought twice about the baby. His younger sister would have noticed because she was really into the baby and wanted to say good night to the baby every night but not the boy.

It would depend on the child and the degree of disruption caused by the disappearance imo.

 

[In da Middle]

It's an excuse why it's okay that she changed Lisa's timeline for four hours. So I lied or was mistaken or confused or blacked out and didn't see her at 10:30 after all. But it doesn't matter because no one could have got in when they were sitting on the front steps.

Could someone have got out through the back?

It is now really bothering me that we've heard so little about all the other entrances.

I was under the impression that there was just this front door that the intruder could have used, or one of the windows, and I had somehow got the notion that the garage was separate from the house. I don't know why. But if there is an entryway to the house through the garage it changes things a lot. If there is a teen with the access code there could be a number of other people with the access code. The people on the front yard wouldn't have seen a person entering or exiting through the back of the house. If the children were dozing they might not have seen anything either.

But all the talk is about the window and the front door.

These back entrances have been on my radar from the beginning. But it still may not change any timeline. If somebody got in, they could have gotten in at anytime either during the time the ladies were out front and waited until all was quiet or even came in after all was quiet. Somebody could have even been waiting behind the detached garage unnoticed for the correct opportunity. It's DARK back there if no back yard lights are on and even then there are many shadowed areas.

 

[Whisperer]

So what is the profile of the person who came in another entrance at another time and took a ten month old baby from the crib, stole some cell phones and turned on all the lights?

 

[Whisperer]

Going back to your original point that LE has the best chance to find flaws in stories in the very beginning, I agree that LE had the perfect opportunity to find inconsistencies in this case since they had open, unfiltered access to both parents in the beginning.

....as LE did. They stated they had conflicting information.

 

[In da Middle]

So what is the profile of the person who came in another entrance at another time and took a ten month old baby from the crib, stole some cell phones and turned on all the lights?

Why does which entrance change the profile? Just wondering. Other than it makes it take a less crafty individual to come in an entrance where nobody is at nor public.

 

[cityslick]

....as LE did. They stated they had conflicting information.

They actually said this after the fact? I don't recall it.

 

[Donjeta]

The suspicion or knowledge that a back entrance had been used might have something to do with the weird comment about DB being afraid to search the backyard.

But you're right, Whisperer, if someone was hiding out in a closet up until everybody was asleep it's a bit strange that he turned all the lights on (if DB didn't leave them on).

 

[cityslick]

Why does which entrance change the profile? Just wondering. Other than it makes it take a less crafty individual to come in an entrance where nobody is at nor public.

I think the lights being on when JI came home blow up the theory that she was abducted prior to 10:30pm, unless you want to stretch your mind to say she went to sleep without turning out any lights.

 

[Whisperer]

Once again, why would a stranger take a ten month old baby?

 

[cityslick]

The suspicion or knowledge that a back entrance had been used might have something to do with the weird comment about DB being afraid to search the backyard.

But you're right, Whisperer, if someone was hiding out in a closet up until everybody was asleep it's a bit strange that he turned all the lights on (if DB didn't leave them on).

Was it ever determined which lights to what rooms were on?

 

[cityslick]

Once again, why would a stranger take a ten month old baby?

Why do you ask this as if it has never happened in the history of keeping track of this stuff?

I got a better question. What was DB's motive for harming her baby?

 

[Whisperer]

Why does which entrance change the profile? Just wondering. Other than it makes it take a less crafty individual to come in an entrance where nobody is at nor public.

What sort of person steals a ten month old baby is my point...and has been from day one. I don't care what entrance, time or anything else because the odds are that no stranger does this type of thing.

 

[Whisperer]

Why do you ask this as if it has never happened in the history of keeping track of this stuff?

I got a better question. What was DB's motive for harming her baby?

frustration, rage, anger, depression, exhaustion and plain old sick of taking care of a baby.

 

[In da Middle]

I think the lights being on when JI came home blow up the theory that she was abducted prior to 10:30pm, unless you want to stretch your mind to say she went to sleep without turning out any lights.

Somebody COULD have been waiting downstairs or entered from any back entrances after the lights went out IF they entered from the back. I also wonder if any lights downstairs were on or not.

 

[Whisperer]

The way to get an idea of where the child is is get a profile of the person who would take her. All I keep seeing are possibilities of how it happened but at no time have I noticed anyone describe the type of individual that would do such a thing. I have listed types that do this sort of thing...and most of them would not bother to secrete a body.

So are most of you saying a crazed psychopath took Lisa and killed her?