Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's weird, it doesn't appear as private when I look at it.mfmangel1 said:The myspace acct. profile is set as "private" and "he" is listed as a female. :waitasec:
Doogie,Dr. Doogie said:We are frantically examining anything and everything that we can discover about this woman and her family, looking for any connections to what we know or suspect about Anna's disappearance. If nothing is discovered to exclude this possible match, we may be proceeding with a DNA test in the near future.
As it becomes appropriate, we will post updates to this information. The woman that we are looking at is understandably nervous and scared about the possibilities, so I want to limit the amount of information that we post here to protect her privacy.
Hi, Annasbro; we've been playing phone tag. My memory is that the mole was high on her right cheekbone. The NCMEC age-advanced picture placement of the mole is wrong. It's on the wrong side and not high enough. This doesn't quite match up with the stunning photo overlay we're looking at right now (we haven't been able to post this because of privacy issues, so I will tell you that though we have some doubts that this could be Anna, the resemblance is uncanny)--but moles can go away, change, be removed. Smallpox vaccination scars do not go away, and I wish we could learn about these a little more, since few people born after 1968 would have them (and Anna did.) Sherlock and I have had quite a correspondence about moles.Annasbro said:Hello Everyone - Dr Doogie- Do you know anything about the mole on Anna's cheek? I couldn't remember which side it was on. On the progressed photo I noticed they placed it on her left cheek. I couldn't quite see it in Anna's 5 year old picture. I noticed that the prospective match had an identical mole but on her right cheek. I was just wondering if we could somehow coordinate this if it could help the matching progress - Thanks
Annasbro, one thing that is hindering us is that our California tipster does not use a computer, and neither does the young woman we are looking at.Annasbro said:Dr. Doogie and Sleuths -Is there any kind of protocol that we have come up with as to making a prospective candidate aware of the case and the web site in a non-threatening way? I know that with our experiences in the past we need to figure out a way that protects an individual's privacy while informing them.
Hey, AB! Good to hear from you!Annasbro said:Dr. Doogie and Slueths -Is there any kind of protocall that we have come up with as to making a prospective candidate aware of the case and the web site in a non-threatening way? I know that with our experiences in the past we need to figure out a way that protects an individual's privacy while informing them.
The picture that we have shows moles where Anna had hers and additional ones that Anna did not have - exactly what you would expect as someone ages.Rhett said:Moles can also appear after adulthood or after adolescence. "Our" Anna could have more moles than she did at the time of her abduction or she could have less so do not go on the moles alone for sure.
We're workin' on it.MagicRose99 said:Hey Doogie? Any way to get a younger pic of this person that we could match up to Anna?
I have not confirmed this person to be the sibling yet. They share the same name.Dr. Doogie said:SherlockJr has been applying her ample geneaology skills at uncovering the family tree of this new woman who looks so much like Anna. She has discovered that the woman has four "full-siblings" and additional younger "half-siblings". Remembering that the woman says that she does not resemble anyone in her family, this is still problematic. It is a question of what would the motivation be for a couple who has several boys and girls to kidnap another child to call their own? We have been working on the assumption that Anna was taken by a childless couple (or at least a "girl-less" couple) to be raised as their daughter. This family does not fit that assumption. There may be additional unknown motives, but they are not obvious at this point.
We have been looking into any possible connections between this family and California (especially the SF Bay Area). The woman says that she has lived in one particular mid-western state (as best that she can remember). However, SherlockJr has uncovered that an older brother seems to have resided in Redwood City, CA at some point in his life (we have not been able to establish an exact timeframe). This brother would have been 18 years old in 1973, so it is possible that he was residing in the Bay Area at that time. Based on pure speculation, it is possible that his mother and father came to visit the brother and abducted Anna at that time. We have absolutely no evidence that this is what occured - it is just being mentioned as a possible scenario that would fit the known details of Anna's disappearance...
I stand corrected - I should have said that someone with the same name as sibling lived in Redwood City. Thanks, SJ!SherlockJr said:I have not confirmed this person to be the sibling yet. They share the same name.
The reason we are left with so much speculation is that the individual who saw the picture on MySpace refuses to give us direct contact with the Anna lookalike, so that every little bit of information has to come through her. I am finding this maddening. Sherlock and Dr. D are wonderful sleuths, but they are having to work through an intermediary whose impressions are certainly not as immediate or helpful as direct contact. In addition to this problem, it now looks as if the intermediary is backing off the entire thing.Dr. Doogie said:I stand corrected - I should have said that someone with the same name as sibling lived in Redwood City. Thanks, SJ!