madeleine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2008
- Messages
- 4,972
- Reaction score
- 90
Weird though.....JMK wasn't exonerated because DNA didn't match but especially because he couldn't be placed in Boulder.
I am really really trying to understand Lacy's logic here. :waitasec:
So she's telling me that if they would have been able to place him in Boulder he would have been their number one suspect even if DNA didn't match?
Heck,the R's DNA didn't match either but you can place them not only in Boulder but at the crime scene.And there is other evidence that points to them.
So....does anyone here understand this woman,except for those who just worship her for what she's done for the R's (not as a DA,a real DA would have done things totally different IMO).
I am really really trying to understand Lacy's logic here. :waitasec:
So she's telling me that if they would have been able to place him in Boulder he would have been their number one suspect even if DNA didn't match?
Heck,the R's DNA didn't match either but you can place them not only in Boulder but at the crime scene.And there is other evidence that points to them.
So....does anyone here understand this woman,except for those who just worship her for what she's done for the R's (not as a DA,a real DA would have done things totally different IMO).