Nom de plume
Member
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2011
- Messages
- 730
- Reaction score
- 24
My concern is that Kir Komrick is possibly lying about who he is, and if he's lying about who he is, then what else could he be lying about in regards to knowledge of the JBR case. I have been torn as to whether to share this information, as I don't want to cause trouble for someone who is only trying to share a possible JBR scenario. However, I feel that it's important for readers to know there is something off about the person who calls himself Kir Komrik, AKA Cyrus Komrik.
Intrigued by KK's anecdotes of his wife, Sadie Ann Komrik, who he says has several personality disorders (primarily narcissism), I decided to do a little digging to find out more about her. What I found is that KK's details about his life & family are somewhat conflicting. He says he has a daughter Maya, who can also be found online. She refers to Kir as her brother. KK says that his son's mother is Sadie, but elsewhere online he says that his son's mother is Morgan Van Houten which he refers to as his "X." He also states that his mother's name is Sadie "Sabrina" Komrik; Sadie Komrik is the same name as his (x?)wife. He says that he and Sadie Ann have a daughter Alex and that both females are models. I can find nowhere else online where this name is corroborated...he only mentions the daughter Maya elsewhere online.
I have additional links & info, but this is the gist of it. My concern is that while KK may have some valid points about the JBR case, he is either lying about his personal life or he suffers from his own mental health issues. This is all my opinion gleaned from online research. Please let me know if I need to clarify.
If what he says is true, then it is not relevant who KK is. IMO we should focus on the message and not the messenger. Let the message stand or fall on its own, regardless of the messenger.
I fall somewhere between the two of you. I saw the same inconsistencies you did dazeerae. (Not to mention if I were his wife I'd be POd big time!!) It does make one question his credibility. At the risk of sounding like one of more infamous members, if the source is questionable, how can you not question the material?
On the other hand, I'm not sure his credibility matters. I don't think he has any inside info at all. His entire section on the pic in question is nothing more than supposition, and he says as much. I have no idea why he's the only one that's ever seemed to catch that, but apparently he is.
I did find it interesting that he mentions FFJ and a certain few members there several times. I think he's either a member, or an avid reader at the site.
He seems to take a very analytical approach to "solving" this. In the end he seems to contradict his theory, then counter contradict it. He discounts things that I don't feel should be discounted. He talks so much about personality disorders, but then discounts their behavior.
Bottom line, I think it's valuable that he points out this picture and it's possible subject, but I don't find much else of value in his theory. Too many things he doesn't account for. JMO