ArianeEmory
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 13, 2013
- Messages
- 5,741
- Reaction score
- 7,114
I mean this respectfully, and while I am not a religious person, I think we can agree that whatever was there of Cooper is gone from the body. His physical remains are not "him". I do understand the desire to be respectful of how human remains are treated, but in many cases on websleuths it becomes impossible to be "respectful" with how the remains are *discussed*...typically because the perp has already brought things over to the horrific. There's a case I'm involved with where the victim was most likely cut up after the murder and burned in a livestock incinerator. The accused (triple murderer) oddly enough (for WS) has a couple of strident defenders. You can bet your butt they try to steer people away from discussing the victim's "charred" remains.
I'm trying to say that after a certain point, the graphic details need to be heard, FOR the victim.
I'm trying to say that after a certain point, the graphic details need to be heard, FOR the victim.