Well, I wasn't going to post about this yet, but changed my mind at the last minute. Also I'm not sure which thread to post it in so I'll drop it here. Might as well do it on this new year eve.
Imagine if you could have just 6 or 7 seconds of pure, unadulterated TRUTH about what was going on in that house that night. 6 or 7 seconds where they thought no one was listening.
We HAVE IT. But the actual content of that glimpse into reality seems to barely be talked about, and the transcript of those enhanced words is NOT correct. What if I told you I believe the correct transcript of the enhanced audio could be much more incriminating. MUCH more.
Having listened to the enhanced audio thousands and thousands of times now, at multitudes of varying speeds, I am confident two major portions of the transcript are wrong.
But first, let me ask you, what would you expect to hear on that enhanced audio, if the story as told by the R's is true. You might expect to hear things like:
Where could she be??
Could they still be in the house??
Get a weapon! What if they are still here?!
Keep Burke close, keep him safe!
Stay together until the police get here.
Look everywhere for her!
Jonbenet can you hear US!?!? HONEY??
Do you see any sign of her?
Who could have done this?!?
Look outside, could she be out there?
Obviously I could go on for hours, but the point is that once the caller thinks she has hung up the phone, the conversation should in some way support the narrative just presented to 911, if the story is true.
Instead, we hear a man angrily bark at someone. Who is this man and why is he angry at one of the remaining people in the house? I think we know who he is and most of what he says. Does it fit the narrative? Of course not.
At the end we have a child asking a question. Does it fit the narrative?
What has been mostly overlooked is the two MIDDLE phrases in the enhanced audio. They have been reported to say either "Help me Jesus. Help me Jesus." or alternatively "What did you do? Help me Jesus."
I am 100% certain the two phrases actually spoken are neither of those suggested.
Everyone seems satisfied that the audio revealed the child was awake and the story that he was asleep is a lie. Yes, that is huge, but what if the smoking gun we've all dreamed of for the last 20 years is the middle two phrases?
For example, what if the middle two phrases directly references the staging and/or the need to obscure the truth?
I'm not ready to post my transcript yet. Not yet.
What I WILL do is encourage each of you to download the enhanced audio. It can be found on Youtube from a segment of the CBS special. Use any of the number of sites available to save youtube video. Then download free audio & video software that allows you to adjust the playback speed and create a repeating loop of segments of the audio. Good free ones can be found called Wavepad and videopad.
I'd suggest loading up the video in wavepad and then saving just the audio of the enhanced audio. Then open that audio and get to work.
Listen to it hundreds of times at normal speed. You'll quickly hear a couple of syllables that don't match up to the suggested translation.
Then start adjusting playback speed. Play the recording at 80% speed and loop it. Loop just the parts you are stuck on, and even just individual words within the phrases. Try 60% speed. 40%. 25%. Listen to it hundreds or thousands of times, over multiple sessions. Think, think some more and come back and listen more.
You will soon realize why the rough, merged together "surface" sounds, sound very similar to the suggested translation, but that different statements with additional syllables lay below the surface.
All my opinion, and my 2 cents.
Happy new year.
Edited to add: I would suspect the CBS team knows there is more to the middle phrases of the recording. I would imagine they were content to demonstrate that three people could be heard on it, including what sounds like a child.
