Count me in, Montgomery County Md here.
:seeya: I grew up in P.G. but escaped years ago.
Count me in, Montgomery County Md here.
They were time stamped by EnCase, not the camera, and EnCase drew that info from the memory card as the pictures had been deleted, overwritten and only the thumbnails were recoverable from the unallocated space of the memory card.
And let's not forget that there was user-initiated Spybot activity on Travis' laptop at the very same time one of the nudes was time stamped. I think there's good reason to question when those nudes were actually taken.
(2nd try posting)
I've thought about this too. Doubt the DT will try to impeach the Bishop directly. He's telling the truth and he's a Bishop. Plus the DT probably doesn't want him to light up again all the points thst prove faceless #1's aff is all lies.
What they might do.....ask the Bishop questions they know he isn't allowed to answer, relating to Travis and covenants.
For example, " did Travis ever discuss his addiction to *advertiser censored* with you?"
The Bishop might be forced to reply with the equivalent of the 5th. As in, " my attorney has advised me not to answer that question."
The truth is Travis never did, but inability to answer and invocation of clergy confidentiality could look like the Bishop is protecting Travis.
I think they were from that day. They were after undeleted photos TA took himself prior to June 4. JA had absolutely NO thought in her head that she was ever going to get caught so totally no reason to plant these on the camera only to delete them. IMO, she wanted one less romp with Travis for whatever kooky reason she had. Perfect to start taking pics during their interlude because it would seem a perfect follow on activity to take more pics in the bathroom without raising his suspicions. That last pic of Travis looking frightened was probably his first sight of the gun/knife and then.............
The roommates weren't home at the time. She should have been worried about the neighbors hearing but perhaps the majority of them work and weren't home either. There was some string on the stairs that looked like tassel fragments from a decorative pillow, to me, so perhaps JA used one of Travis' pillows as a make shift silencer and took the pillow with her afterwards.
MOO
All of a sudden, I realize that AA said something about JA going to get her hair done in December 2006 in Pasadena (?). I'll bet she went to the same place to get it done before the murder. Maybe someone knows where this was?
I'll admit that I have not read Shanna Hogan's book. I did read this interview where she says:
"It's definitely not a case of good and evil, as I may have thought naively when I first entered it. There were definitely fifty shades of gray in this relationship."
"I think if he ever realized how much he hurt her, he would have been mortified. [He never knew] how truly obsessed she was and that she wasn't okay with it; I think he never realized what he did to her."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/janice-harper/picture-perfect-is-almost_b_3909052.html
I beg to disagree.
Even if <modsnip> was to fake remorse, the prosecution hands have been tied by JSS.
In the trial minutes dated October 21st, JSS granted the defense motion to preclude evidence that the defendant lacks remorse. Also precluded was any evidence that JA made threats against trial participants.
Sorry.![]()
Knowledge is power...
I too am anxiously awaiting the defense strategy for the Bishop. Anyone know what comes after the Bishop? Is it Juan's computer guru?
Wish a lipreader would tell us what JA mutters woefully to herself around 16:12 about that. She's paying very close attention and this damning evidence seems totally new to her.
She says "*advertiser censored**k You...twice...
I'm good at lip reading...
Hopefully if that happens the bishop's attorney is allowed to object and state that the bishop is not allowed to state whether any such conversation took place nor what any content was if there was such a conversation.