Oh I am sure Juan will review Dr Fonseca's CV. I don't even understand why she was called. Her specialty is unusual sexual practices and the psychological make up of those individuals. I haven't seen the relevance of her testimony. To me she could have been describing anyone in their 20's or 30's. It was the age of sexual awakening for alot of us. I can speak for myself here, but that was the age of '"fooling around" before settling down and finding "the one" for me. I think Travis was late to the game and absolutely overwhelmed with a nymphomaniac that was the murderess. He knew all these nice girls with intact morals like Lisa & Mimi and then unfortunately met this "sex kitten" with much more experience & willing to do all these things with him.
Just think of how many lives the killer has ruined - the Hughes, Lisa (slashed tires, anonymous hate mail) & Deanna too, who had to admit on the witness stand that she and Travis had made love, and I say this because I think Deanna & Travis were soul mates but marriage was just not in the cards for them. I think Deanna is married now, not sure, but she still has Napoleon, that shows how close they were.
I respect psychologists, but this testimony of Dr Fonseca's is just psychobabble to me - just like ALV & Dr Samuels. Dr Demarte spoke like a real clinician, she cited real diagnoses with plenty of relevant examples to make it easier for a jury to understand & correlate the killer's behavior to the diagnosis. I hope she comes back to help Juan.