Just out of curiosity, have these people come to any sort of agreement as to what actually constitutes "*advertiser censored*?" Of any variety?
I'm guessing not. And I'd really like to see them try.
"I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description [hard-core *advertiser censored*]; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that."
Potter Stewart, 1915 - 1985, Associate U.S. Supreme Court Justice. Concurring, Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184 (1964).