You mean what did Juan do to the hard drive? Or the expert?
The expert. He did something to it. And Juan says he can prove it.
You mean what did Juan do to the hard drive? Or the expert?
Maybe it's all a matter of semantics. It sounds like there was not *advertiser censored* of any type ON his computer. The question was over whether *advertiser censored* had been accessed via the internet on his computer.
I agree with you. I cannot wait til she comes up for a retention vote! I will be voting her out. My question is that it sure seems to me that she does NOT like Juan Martinez? AZL do you know if there could be any truth to this?
The expert. He did something to it. And Juan days he can prove it.
Hey. Why didn't the defense use Lonnie Dworkin again as their computer expert? He has the creds. I wonder why they didn't retain him to check the computer and report his findings? :thinking: :laughing:
From WAT:
Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial · 30s 30 seconds ago
#JodiArias is wearing a wrist brace again.
Assuming from a raging game of patty cake with Sheriff Joe.
I haven't seen any evidence of that. Most judges would have reprimanded Juan more by now. She seems pretty tolerant of poor behavior from everyone in the courtroom regardless of which side they're on. I couldn't tell, though, from the tweets who she seemed "angry" with today.
agree, she needs to stop most of the sidebars, just rule on the objection and then move on, she needs to stop all the attorneys asking questions that confound and confuddle the witnesses, she needs to realise that this is not a rehash of the trial but a sentencing hearing, the judge who presided over the Darren Mack trial and then the hearing where Routiss (aka Rooty) argued buyers remorse as Mack tried to get out of his plea deal would have done a very good job
There's a presiding judge. He doesn't really "oversee" her courtroom, no. And he certainly wouldn't get involved in minor issues like rebuking a witness who is showing disrespect for the process.
Would you give an opinion on whether Juan is liked or disliked among judges? Does he have a bad rap with them or some of them?
Are we making too much of this defence witness shaking hands with the (whatever she is while she's awaiting the sentencing verdict), then?
If anybody is worried right now, just bookmark this post. Juan's got this. :juanettes:I dunno..... :dunno: I think this will all end up being a complete waste of time. If Juan says he has proof this guy damaged something on purpose I believe him. I don't like or trust this "expert" (can't recall his name"). He seemed comfortable using the word "slimy", its just that I don't think it is the prosecution that is being "slimy".
I have a feeling that Juan is letting this man hang himself. HE is gonna be in a whole lot of trouble if it is found that he tampered with evidence. I tend to believe the witness did, over the prosecution. Oh I hope there is video of him damaging evidence!rayer:
I just find it too difficult to believe that neither the defense expert at the time or the prosecution found any of what this guy claims he found. :nono: I just don't believe it. :gavel:
There's a presiding judge. He doesn't really "oversee" her courtroom, no. And he certainly wouldn't get involved in minor issues like rebuking a witness who is showing disrespect for the process.
I would be interested in knowing what prompted reanalyzing the computer in the first place.
And all the sim card missing etc., why wasn't it brought up during the first trial.
William Pitts now Martinez is claiming Neumeister broke the computer.
Neumeister: "That's just slimy...that's just slimy..."