Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - 11/21-11/23/14 In recess

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
But how can the judge allow a witness to say "we will go at it....." ? Sounds combative and hostile to me. Does Juan need to ask the judge to tell the witness to knock if off first before she intervenes? I'm not up to school on all the rules of the court but I would NEVER say that to an attorney if I was on the stand.

I know. I'm used to more formal courtroom protocol, and very strict judges when it comes to enforcing it.
 
Well aleast we know child *advertiser censored* wasn't found. Cause Nurmi and co would have gotten that headline out already. And when you go to a pornsite and browse through the different categories (Female friendly, hardcore, gay, blah blah blah, lesbian, whatever), you can find "Teen", but that's starring ladies who are 18+ with 18+ bodies. Not the kinda thing a pedophile would be into.

And I find it curious how Wilmott got Neurowhatever to talk about the hits for "teen" and "tween" but I never saw any reporting of hits for "tween sex" or "teen sex" or "teen *advertiser censored*" or any specific search like. He ended up looking for "tween" and having to say the internet hits can include "between" as well.

BBM - Thanks for sharing your expertise. :dance:
 
Evidently, Arizona courts are run differently than courts in other states.
 
From WAT:

Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial · 22s 22 seconds ago


"I just couldn't believe what I found compared to the testimony, it just didn't make sense." -B #jodiarias


If this truly is the "expert" who testified about seeing CMJA in TA's eye in 2nd-to-last shower pic, then I am laughing my heiny off at this testibloney.....IIRC, that expert's resume included making music videos (for the band YES I think). Sorry if I'm wrong - will sleuth later - too intrigued by what's happening in the hearing at the moment...If anyone can add to this, please chime in.....

Actually it was Blue Oyster Cult of "Don't Fear the Reaper" hit! LOL!
 
Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial 33s33 seconds ago

Witness B walks over to shakes #JodiArias' hand & smile at her! #FRIENDS

WHAT. The everloving. F.

Geez Louise. I'm GOBSMACKED. He's such an objective forensic professional. ROLLS EYES RIGHT OUT OF HEAD.

Btw, he is also an Emmy award winner and musician and composer. I think he's ready for his close up, *cough* narcissist *cough*.
 
I agree. My hinky meter is raising HUGE red flags.

Isn't this guy's name Brian? Wasn't there a Brian during the trial that was claiming to be her new bf, visiting her, etc? Just wondering if there's any relation between the two...
 
Gee, since the victim's family has official standing in the trial, maybe DeMarte should give Sam a big hug after testifying.

Seems reasonable....since it's perfectly normal for that to happen in Az. courtrooms. Or, does that only apply to the defendant? Even one convicted of murder....
 
Regarding how disrespectful Neumeister was to Juan: it's possible Juan didn't ask the judge to intervene in hopes that Neumeister may treat Juan the same way in front of the jury. The jury would hate Neumeister right away...regardless if they like Juan or not. Neumeister does not come across as a likeable fellow to put it mildly.


Good first post Silly! Welcome to WS! Glad you came out of lurking and posted!
 
Isn't this guy's name Brian? Wasn't there a Brian during the trial that was claiming to be her new bf, visiting her, etc? Just wondering if there's any relation between the two...

Brian Carr. No relation.
 
I'm more worried about the casual use of secret hearings and bench conferences and the failure to put some time limits on witnesses! The presiding judge does have regular meetings of judges handling capital cases to ensure that the cases are moving along at a reasonable speed, so apparently his standards are not too strict.

Let's get this courtroom back on American soil and get the trial moving, and then I will agree to put basic respect on the agenda as item #3 lol.

Thanks. I think many people who are not well versed in trials but who care about the judicial system can agree with that. This trial has been startling in the ways you mention for most of us who are learning from it. :seeya:
 
so do they go back to the sentencing hearing and then continue the arguing over the computers in December

i have a question, wasn't this information on the computer something to do with the secret witness. Did the *advertiser censored* info what the secret witness suppose to talk about, or have something to with. I thought the reason the info on the computer is what started the media out of court room, and part of the info that they needed solved to continue with this so called witness... Am I understanding this correct.
 
I think I'm obsessed with this trial. It's my birthday today (I'm 31!) and my friends want to take me out. My response? 'Thanks but can we do dinner rather than lunch? I've got *work* to do right now.' I hope reading these tweets count as 'work.' It sure is more exhausting than paid work!

:cheer:
:bdsong:
♫ Happy Birthday to you Rose!!!! ♫
 
i have a question, wasn't this information on the computer something to do with the secret witness. Did the *advertiser censored* info what the secret witness suppose to talk about, or have something to with. I thought the reason the info on the computer is what started the media out of court room, and part of the info that they needed solved to continue with this so called witness... Am I understanding this correct.

People might have speculated about that, but I don't think we ever heard that from anyone who would know.
 
I'm more worried about the casual use of secret hearings and bench conferences and the failure to put some time limits on witnesses! The presiding judge does have regular meetings of judges handling capital cases to ensure that the cases are moving along at a reasonable speed, so apparently his standards are not too strict.

Let's get this courtroom back on American soil and get the trial moving, and then I will agree to put basic respect on the agenda as item #3 lol.

All these failures are related. They aren't separate issues. The bench conferences and secret meetings and failure to reign in anyone anyone, ever, and her caving in to a convicted murderer's demand to testify in secret..... all are indicative of a single problem..... a judge who can't control a courtroom and who is in waaaaaaaay over her head.
 
Witness B walks over to shakes #JodiArias' hand & smile at her! #FRIENDS

He hates Juan so much that he's willing to buddy up with a criminal! Where does Nurmi find these slimy cartoons!?

Speaking of slimy cartoons, it turns out that Fonseca studies and works with sex offenders (Nurmi's speciality). Coincidence? I think not. She also:

... would like to reintegrate the molesters and pedophiles into our society but under strict supervision....Their sexual proclivity, while destructive, is neither evil nor diseased in ways those words are understood. To call it “satanic” is to misrepresent it “terribly,” she says. What pedophiles and molesters and rapists do is awful and wrong. But, she says, “these are our brothers,” part of “our human family” and she wants to carefully bring them back into the fold at a time when very few would agree with or allow her her wish.

http://www.thomaslarson.com/publications/san-diego-reader/125-not-only-the-man.html
 
Isn't this guy's name Brian? Wasn't there a Brian during the trial that was claiming to be her new bf, visiting her, etc? Just wondering if there's any relation between the two...

This is Bryan Neumeister -- of pretend assassin's pretend reflection in the eye and sometime Blue Oyster Cult fame.

He's old enough to be her dad, but then again so was Darryl Brewer, Richard Samuels, William Zervakos, etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
132
Guests online
2,277
Total visitors
2,409

Forum statistics

Threads
602,312
Messages
18,138,954
Members
231,330
Latest member
yesaccasey
Back
Top