Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - 11/3/14 Hearing - Part 2

[ILikeToBendPages]

HLN - January 2, 2103



This is for Jodi's damaged hard drive - you know the one that had photos of Travis chasing a little boy that her own defense didn't take seriously, and of photo's she took of herself on the road, but not for any specific purpose, and the man that saw the bruises all over her, that again her defense let her down, wasn't looked for, but she would of.......



HLN - January 2, 2103

Also Thursday, defense attorneys asked prosecutors to turn over Arias’ computer hard drive so they can conduct their own independent testing on it. They also complained that prosecutors weren’t being forthcoming in turning over evidence, because they have not given the defense access to the contents of the hard drive.

Prosecutor Juan Martinez explained that the delay was because the hard drive was damaged and an outside firm had to examine it for potential evidence.

Martinez says his team is still waiting for the examination and would turn over to the defense the hard drive and the firm’s report when everything is complete. It is still unclear what the hard drive could reveal.

and

Vinnie Politan @VinniePolitan January 13 2013

#JodiArias forensic computer expert: recovered pictures of male genitalia from a damaged hard drive - Jodi's not Travis's computer.

 

[gcharlie]

My thoughts exactly. The hard copy should never be signed out, unless something is modified.

I can understand the defense being able to sign out the hard drive for examination, given that it is an adversarial system. The only way to get around not signing it out would be to have the evidence held by a neutral third party with no vested interest in the outcome of the trial.

If anyone here has in-depth knowledge of LE practices, would LE/the State make a copy of the hard drive just before releasing it to the defense and then immediately on return to see if any changes had taken place? Seems like this hard drive left the custody of LE a number of times, including several times this summer to the defense.

 

[RadarLuv]

"PHOENIX - Attorneys for convicted murderer Jodi Arias have filed a motion to dismiss all charges against her, alleging prosecutorial misconduct."

http://www.abc15.com/news/region-ph...se-lawyers-file-motion-to-dismiss-all-charges

 

[LaLaw2000]

This has been the most repulsive trial/penalty phase I have ever followed. The trial jury found her guilty of first degree murder, FGS, and now this penalty phase is seeming to go on forever. I am disgusted beyond words and honestly don't know how much more I can take. But it isn't about me.

I posted at the beginning of the penalty phase that the DT was trying to wear down Travis' family into just asking Juan to go ahead and take the death penalty off the table. That didn't work so now they even want LWOP out. As long as the DT was wishing, they now want JA to walk free. I have had lofty wishes in my lifetime but only the reasonable ones were attained. Theirs are not even reasonable.

Judge Stephens may even be getting tired of the DT's sordid games. She needs to go into that courtroom in the morning and control it, IMO. She needs to face the fact that Nurmi is holding this trial hostage and tell him to get on with it. If he doesn't want to call a witness to the stand, then hold him in contempt. This Judge needs to finally tell Nurmi in no uncertain terms that she runs that courtroom and he will recognize that fact. Get tough, Judge, and stay strong.

It's not going to surprise me, though, if this trial is ground to a halt until after the Thanksgiving holiday. I could not despise anyone any more than I do JA, the DT, and the P.I.

Meanwhile, I keep all of Travis' family in my thoughts and wish them health, strength, and firm resolve to not let JA and her DT call the shots. They have come this far, GB them, and they know that JA deserves the death penalty. Please let them be well and persevere!

I don't post much anymore. I am usually behind and just reading the latest developments with my mouth hanging open in total disbelief!

MOO

*Yes, I changed my avatar!

 

[MeeBee]

@jeffgoldesq: Headed back to Phoenix for more #JodiArias trial. Should be witness on stand tomorrow. Don't expect scaredy cat Jodi before appeal decided.

 

[janx]

You're right. The motion doesn't say anything about overwritten files but about someone going in without a write blocker and deleting thousands of files. I just figured the only way to successfully alter something but still have it be findable is by over writing it.

So now I'm more confused than ever. If LE was going to destroy evidence this is the dumbest, most traceable way possible. It just doesn't make sense. I want to know what exactly is happening. I want to know what Juan's response is going to be.

And Nurmi is known for wanting things out into the media that he knows will help him. He is calling a some computer guy to testify and if he and Mr. Computer guy were confident in what they'd found, they wouldn't want his testimony sealed. Maybe computer guy is the secret witness. This ploy of having nothing but this motion out there without the anchor of a thorough cross examination is very beneficial to the defense but, again, only in the court of public opinion. Maybe Nurmi wanted to save this motion until after the computer guy testified but now that the ish is hitting the fan, he went for a desperation Hail Mary pass.

This computer expert could be anybody. Nurmi doesn't exactly have a stellar track record when it comes to expert witnesses. I've been reading all of these comments and speculation for the last day or so, and from where I sit, your last sentence seems the most plausible.

It's fruitless to speculate on how/why anything made its way to Alexander's computer. To do so at this point would be like speculating about how/why Alexander wrote the "pedo letters." We simply don't know if any of this is true. It certainly seems improbable based on the testimony of both defense and prosecution witnesses in the guilt phase of the trial.

 

[gcharlie]

I'm hearing that George Barwood's private groups and JAII are going crazy over this new motion. In one of the private FB pages, there are more than 130 pages of comments.

Some of these people think she'll be out by Thanksgiving.

 

[prima.facie]

You can look this guy up on ripoff report.

************
this may be a little off topic, but seeing this post i had to respond.

"ripoff report" is a RIPOFF. there was a major investigation done on the owner of that site by a major news outlet and they found he is a fraud. he fabricates 'rip offs' and then extorts the alleged bad people into paying him TONS of money to remove the bad info. he literally will create the complaints (posing as victims). he has a criminal record and so on.

do not believe ANYTHING on that site! read this for more info http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2007-02-01/news/the-real-rip-off-report/ and http://ripoffreport-scam.blogspot.com

just wanted people to be aware!

 

[RR0004]

The killer's description of Travis' reaction to a damaged CD of their travel photos seemed artificial. According to her testimony, he really became exercised, and then some. Since she supposedly brought her record of the trip to share, they might both be disappointed but I doubt he would be that rude. Plenty of Sleuths would have suspected she either distorted the incident or made it up. Only sex could pacify him, don't you know. In light of the new defense motion, the likelihood is she created the scene she describes because it was useful to cover what she was really up to that afternoon, all of it premeditated to fit not only her escape but her utter destruction of Travis. If she indeed was in part motivated by rage, jealousy & envy of his imminent trip to Cancun, their own ruined travelogue would have demonstrated both insult & revenge as it infected his computer. "This is what I think of you and this is what our memories mean now. To hell with your trip without me!"

And, IIRC, wasn't she super pi$$ed about his blog? What better way to really stick it to him, then to infect his computer.

PS- I know I'm really running wild with this, but I just think this chick is so demented.

 

[Shadowboy]

Kiefer really can't be called a reporter or journalist. He's a tool. And has been working behind the scenes for the defense for a while now. He has a big personal beef with JM. He's filled with vitriol.

(Dodging tomatoes now). I know our own KCL has her negative experiences with Keifer; so -- yeah -- he might be an A-hole. But he obviously has good sources, and, you know what? That's a journalist's job. You get on the inside, you stroke egos, you get the story. He has finely honed journalistic instincts, even if he IS biased against JM. (And maybe for good reason? ... Ouch! That was a green tomato. No fair!)

THAT's why journalism is (or used to be) the "Fourth Estate." ... Edward R Murrow, Woodward and Bernstein ... Uncle Walter after his visit to Viet Nam ... TRUE journalism doesn't happen by way of press releases. It happens through the eyes of those who seek/know the facts, synthesize the facts, ASSESS the facts, and write the facts. Even if the "public" doesn't LIKE the facts.

In J-school pedagogy, this synthesis and assessment SHOULD be without bias; but that horse left the barn decades ago. Don't get me started on E-Journalism and the Blogosphere. Bleh. Label it as opinion. State your sources. Otherwise, sell it on e-Bay.

Kiefer is MAYBE getting his "inside leads" from the DT; but, most likely he is getting these 'tips' from a few folks in the court house who clue him into new filings. Again, having those tipsters is what a GOOD journalist attempts to cultivate.

Read the end of Erickson's latest blog to understand how reporters and journalists see it. And how they see the backlash of their reports.
http://www.fromthethirdrow.com/post/102403651522/porngate

 

[LinasK]

"PHOENIX - Attorneys for convicted murderer Jodi Arias have filed a motion to dismiss all charges against her, alleging prosecutorial misconduct."

http://www.abc15.com/news/region-ph...se-lawyers-file-motion-to-dismiss-all-charges

This is inaccurate, she's already been convicted- there are no "charges" to be dropped, only a conviction to vacate, which wouldn't be done by JSS I think. It reeks of desperation, if the charges are not dropped, then they want the DP off the table.

 

[LinasK]

(Dodging tomatoes now). I know our own KCL has her negative experiences with Keifer; so -- yeah -- he might be an A-hole. But he obviously has good sources, and, you know what? That's a journalist's job. You get on the inside, you stroke egos, you get the story. He has finely honed journalistic instincts, even if he IS biased against JM. (And maybe for good reason? ... Ouch! That was a green tomato. No fair!)

THAT's why journalism is (or used to be) the "Fourth Estate." ... Edward R Murrow, Woodward and Bernstein ... Uncle Walter after his visit to Viet Nam ... TRUE journalism doesn't happen by way of press releases. It happens through the eyes of those who seek/know the facts, synthesize the facts, ASSESS the facts, and write the facts. Even if the "public" doesn't LIKE the facts.

In J-school pedagogy, this synthesis and assessment SHOULD be without bias; but that horse left the barn decades ago. Don't get me started on E-Journalism and the Blogosphere. Bleh. Label it as opinion. State your sources. Otherwise, sell it on e-Bay.

Kiefer is MAYBE getting his "inside leads" from the DT; but, most likely he is getting these 'tips' from a few folks in the court house who clue him into new filings. Again, having those tipsters is what a GOOD journalist attempts to cultivate.

Read the end of Erickson's latest blog to understand how reporters and journalists see it. And how they see the backlash of their reports.
http://www.fromthethirdrow.com/post/102403651522/porngate

Keifer's reports reek of Yellow Journalism. Sorry, but this guy is NOT unbiased, it's blatantly obvious that he's a shill for the defense.
Plus, he refused to name his sources.

 

[ShadyLady]

And, IIRC, wasn't she super pi$$ed about his blog? What better way to really stick it to him, then to infect his computer.

PS- I know I'm really running wild with this, but I just think this chick is so demented.

And remember she had recently stolen Travis' journals. She left no stone unturned trying to destroy him.

 

[RadarLuv]

But even AZ lawyer said she could walk in certain circumstances (I forgot the terminology). It is posted a few pages back, so there must be a way that could happen.


EDIT; Here is what AZL said when I asked why they were basically retrying her;

Quote Originally Posted by RadarLuv View Post
I am really not understanding how they can retry this WHOLE thing. Can someone break it down for me? The evidence was presented in it's entirety and she was convicted of 1st degree murder. Attorneys in da house, please dumb it down for me and tell me how this is becoming a whole new being. Where is the line drawn?


AZL: They wouldn't retry it--the charges would be dropped and she would walk. This would happen only if there was intentional destruction of evidence by the state (which does happen) and the evidence was exculpatory. If the evidence is child *advertiser censored*, IMO it would be slightly exculpatory because it would support JA's latest story.

This is inaccurate, she's already been convicted- there are no "charges" to be dropped, only a conviction to vacate, which wouldn't be done by JSS I think. It reeks of desperation, if the charges are not dropped, then they want the DP off the table.

 

[LinasK]

I'm hearing that George Barwood's private groups and JAII are going crazy over this new motion. In one of the private FB pages, there are more than 130 pages of comments.

Some of these people think she'll be out by Thanksgiving.

And who's crazy enough to let Jodi carve their turkey???? She oughta be spending it in Perryville.

 

[itzkatiex0]

Trust in Juan... He will fix this and Jodi will not walk.

 

[LambChop]

The killer's description of Travis' reaction to a damaged CD of their travel photos seemed artificial. According to her testimony, he really became exercised, and then some. Since she supposedly brought her record of the trip to share, they might both be disappointed but I doubt he would be that rude. Plenty of Sleuths would have suspected she either distorted the incident or made it up. Only sex could pacify him, don't you know. In light of the new defense motion, the likelihood is she created the scene she describes because it was useful to cover what she was really up to that afternoon, all of it premeditated to fit not only her escape but her utter destruction of Travis. If she indeed was in part motivated by rage, jealousy & envy of his imminent trip to Cancun, their own ruined travelogue would have demonstrated both insult & revenge as it infected his computer. "This is what I think of you and this is what our memories mean now. To hell with your trip without me!"

BBM: But if she stated that, she just admitted she knew she was going there before she left home. It's not likely she would have had the CD just laying around in a rental car. JA had to make the effort to bring it with her.

So part of her plan could have been that LE would find this material and believe Travis was killed by someone out to get rid of a pedophile. Someone with children perhaps. This could be why JA was so insistent that he had *advertiser censored* on his computer because she knew she put it there.

 

[RR0004]

This guy is an arrogant inflamer. He makes me want to barf!!!!!




michaelbkiefer

And under Arizona law, I don't even have to tell the court who my sources are. Sorry. Take a Valium. #jodiarias




Monday November 10, 2014 8:13








Michael Kiefer@michaelbkiefer

https://twitter.com/michaelbkiefer

Sorry facts upset so many of you. Not everything magically appears on the internet. Some motions are on paper. It is what it is. #jodiarias

OMGoodness. What a piece of work.

 

[LinasK]

BBM: But if she stated that, she just admitted she knew she was going there before she left home. It's not likely she would have had the CD just laying around in a rental car. JA had to make the effort to bring it with her.

So part of her plan could have been that LE would find this material and believe Travis was killed by someone out to get rid of a pedophile. Someone with children perhaps. This could be why JA was so insistent that he had *advertiser censored* on his computer because she knew she put it there.

Ahhh, so the Ninja's were a married couple???

 

[dog.gone.cute]

I'm hearing that George Barwood's private groups and JAII are going crazy over this new motion. In one of the private FB pages, there are more than 130 pages of comments.

Some of these people think she'll be out by Thanksgiving.

BBM: Yep ... last night, I peaked in to :crazy: LaLaLand to see what they were saying and they are already planning her "Homecoming" :gaah:

One of them said there planning her Thanksgiving Dinner -- menu included ... LOL !

I was ROFLMAO reading the carp !

:hilarious: I tell ya can't make this stuff up !