Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - 2/5 - 2/9 - Break

[Truth Detector]

This wasn't on Twitter, this was the JAII site. I think Justusforall is her handle over there.

I don't believe that's MDLR.

I replied to katydid thusly:

Some people have more than one twitter account.

Justus Forusall on Facebook is a community page. It may have multiple administrators, though I doubt she is one.

MDLR projects herself as a celebrity. If there's a picture/avatar her face and, er, assets are going to be in it.

MDLR enjoys her own likeness. Scales are not 'Cha-Cha' enough for her.

Moreover, as the mitigation specialist, she doesn't have to vie for a seat in the courtroom. She's allowed to be within sweet-nothings whispering distance of the murderess.

Thus, it would make little sense for her to think that, like the public, she might not get a seat if she doesn't hurry back into the courtroom.

Ergo, I maintain that she is not Justus Forusall and therefore did not post this:

View attachment 68944

 

[TexMex]

Not that it matters in this phase, probably, but I wonder exactly WHEN DB told JA he planned on moving back to Monterrey. That could be what triggered her pursuing a new relationship and TA became the focus. JA did have a history of moving directly from one relationship to another. Interesting to me. Also, this is neither here nor there, but as far as JA and DB having separate bedrooms, I think I assumed that they had separate rooms for the occasions his son would be there. DB would probably not want to expose his son to them sleeping together unmarried. He did seem protective of his young son. Until my 2d husband and I knew we were going to get married, my kids never even saw us do more than hold hands, never mind see us in bed together.

Yes...she met Travis in September and when DB decided to follow his ex-wife again, her total focus became getting this handsome, marriage minded Mormon to the alter. So Darryl left in December and she stayed behind
She and Darryl followed the wife once already...but it benefited her because she was able to play real estate mogul since houses were more affordable in Palm Desert

 

[Love Never Fails]

BBM That seems a very odd thing to say. Why would he go right to the "safety" word. It sounds as though he's really not exactly sure. It's as though he's defensive about the topic and he compulsively brings it up. Even though the words say he trusted her, the way the paragraph flows makes it seem as though he has a niggling feeling that he might be wrong.

One thing we now know. Darryl Brewer is a liar. He either lied in his tv interview or he lied in his interview with prosecutors. In tv interview he talks of how mature JA was and he trusted her with his son. In interview with prosecutors, he said she was immature and whiny and he would not marry her and moved close to his ex wife for his son, and gave the inference that JA wasn't trusted with his son. I truly believe he was terrified during trial one that if she were set free, she would kill either him or his son. I believe Matt and Bobby also feared for their lives. I believe the reason Matt told the prosecution he would lie for Jodi is because he was smart. He knew neither side could call him. Who could blame any of them right now?? They know what happened to Travis. And if they came forward now, everyone would say they are lying. Either way it is bad.

 

[TexMex]

Breakfast to soak up the honey whiskey from last night then to the beach. Supposed to be almost 80 today

 

[Love Never Fails]

Curious, I had to smile with your genteel use of the term "ladies room". I have a bit of an "issue" when it comes to using private restrooms. I'm even shy using the bathroom in a hotel room when my hubby is within "earshot", IYKWIM. So I can't even imagine how mortifying it must be to have to do your "business", especially if your're having "#2" issues, in a jail cell. I recall reading somewhere that when she does go to the "ladies room" she is accompanied by a court officer (bailiff?). I'm pretty sure I would have performance issues in that case. Even worse, it's quite possible that she has to use the toilet in the holding cell. Maybe prisoners get used to being so exposed in that regard, but in JA's case, I hope it is torture for her. MOO.

Good morning Pen. I laughed out loud when you called me out on saying ladies room. I am just like you. I think I could face the mean women of prison easier than going to the restroom with anyone near me. I would just say: kill me now. Isolation would much be preferred to general population. I would feel the same about group showers. As far as the "ladies room" comment, rough language just grosses me out. I just wasn't raised that way.

 

[Love Never Fails]

AZL mentioned something recently that I can't ignore because I gathered it was the case: JA seems to be calling the shots much more during this mitigation phase. The way I see it, it's as if her attorneys have simply given up on an effective defense and are following her wishes to impeach witnesses she has developed grudges against--this being more important than saving her own hide. Or maybe JA feels that this impeachment is somehow important to the upcoming appeal process, since it's the only hope she has now. Yet the witnesses she seems to want to impeach are the most solid witnesses the prosecution has. She cannot make a dent in these witnesses. I am new to following a trial closely and find this intriguing.

Have her attorneys not explained the logic of a defense that would benefit her the most? Is she so self-absorbed that she thinks what they say doesn't matter? Is she so involved with her sick fans that she takes advice from them rather than her attorneys?

Re: your last paragraph. Do you think attorneys can explain anything logical to a Psycopath? I am sure there are stronger attorneys who just say no. But JA has tried to get these attorneys off her case so many times and failed. I think these attorneys finally just fell in the slime put with Jodi. I believe both Nurmi and Wimott are now as batty as Jodi is.

 

[Love Never Fails]

Zoey W!!!!! You are back!!! I have been asking where you had gone to. I Don't do twitter. Don't do FB. I thought you were lost forever. You do not have my permission to stop posting here. Got it?

Thanks so much for all your posts. Please don't leave till Jodi is put away.


Curious

 

[ZoeyW]

ZoeyW, your link to the vindictive letter JA wrote to Travis' employer didn't work for me. Would you please post it or describe what she said? TIA

Here you go friend, http://www.hlntv.com/video/2013/05/10/exclusive-jodis-chilling-e-mail Jodi wrote to PPL that she would appreciate her "Implied innocence" be taken into consideration at any memorial get together they would have regarding Travis. It was nuts.

 

[pinkandgreenmom]

Here you go friend, http://www.hlntv.com/video/2013/05/10/exclusive-jodis-chilling-e-mail Jodi wrote to PPL that she would appreciate her "Implied innocence" be taken into consideration at any memorial get together they would have regarding Travis. It was nuts.

She is something else, isn't she?

 

[pinkandgreenmom]

ooops- double post

 

[ZoeyW]

She is something else, isn't she?

It is mind blowing how her obsession truly was stronger than death. Even after killing him, she STILL is more concerned about how her "reputation was being cast in a bad light" than the fact that his co-workers were leveled to the floor with shock and grief. Moreover is that she entertains the idea that a leader of a million dollar corporation would change his remarks based on what the arrested defendant, who sits in jail awaiting trial for murdering one of his employees requested. Her sole focus is herself.

Juan Martinez sure had it right when he asked her under oath "Isn't it true that the real reason you sent Mr. Alexander's elderly, frail grandmother the flowers was in an effort to assuage YOUR guilt, not for her at all? He didn't even wait for her to answer. He just moved on. Love that about him. Most often, it is the question he wants the jury to hear. What Jodi Arias responds is wholly irrelevant.

 

[ZoeyW]

View attachment 68948



Breakfast to soak up the honey whiskey from last night then to the beach. Supposed to be almost 80 today

This is off topic. I must tell you a funny. I went to Texas and New Mexico to visit when I was about 21. I had never been anywhere except where I lived in the North, so everything was new to me, especially the food. I recall ordering one day and I casually said, "Whatever you do, please don't let them put any of that weird green stuff on my food"/
( The green chili peppers, they put on E V E R Y T H I N G was too much for this wetta )

The waitress, my friends from there and others who overheard my blaspheme yelled out "Get a Rope" which was a popular local commercial at the time. http://youtu.be/vgrGyR6EYbY

I learned the meaning of the old adage "When in Rome, do as the Romans do", or at least don't mock them!!

 

[MeeBee]

I don't believe that's MDLR.

I replied to katydid thusly:



Justus Forusall on Facebook is a community page. It may have multiple administrators, though I doubt she is one.

MDLR projects herself as a celebrity. If there's a picture/avatar her face and, er, assets are going to be in it.

MDLR enjoys her own likeness. Scales are not 'Cha-Cha' enough for her.

Moreover, as the mitigation specialist, she doesn't have to vie for a seat in the courtroom. She's allowed to be within sweet-nothings whispering distance of the murderess.

Thus, it would make little sense for her to think that, like the public, she might not get a seat if she doesn't hurry back into the courtroom.

Ergo, I maintain that she is not Justus Forusall and therefore did not post this:

View attachment 68944

Justus is a poster on the JAII site. After she posted what you posted about Tanisha, she then came back and asked it to be posted in the vent room. I thought Justus was an admin over there but I'm not sure and don't really care to go over and confirm. I really think it's her. I don't think she was vying for a seat when she wrote that, just she needed to get back.

Justus, much like the person that runs Jodi's twitter, posts as someone who is right there everyday, with an inside track in the courtroom. They have information that only someone with a direct line to Jodi would have, as any other supporter would not be able to communicate with her that often. There's been no mention of a supporter of hers that's been in attendance everyday.

And then theres this:

"Jodi will be speaking to the jury today..."

Who else but MDLR a would have known that?

 

[DebinGA]

Here you go friend, http://www.hlntv.com/video/2013/05/10/exclusive-jodis-chilling-e-mail Jodi wrote to PPL that she would appreciate her "Implied innocence" be taken into consideration at any memorial get together they would have regarding Travis. It was nuts.

JA on Sept. 1, 3 mos. after her slaughtered TA:

It is my understanding that his memory will be honored and recognized in Las Vegas this September. I would humbly remind those who say any different -- that I am innocent until proven guilty. It is with a spirit of humility that I would ask that if I am in any way referenced during Travis' memorial at the team breakout, that my implied innocence is taken into account.

That "if I am in any way referenced" suggests she's thinking a "defamation" suit might be a happy prospect. It certainly illustrates her controlling nature.

 

[Truth Detector]

Justus is a poster on the JAII site. After she posted what you posted about Tanisha, she then came back and asked it to be posted in the vent room. I thought Justus was an admin over there but I'm not sure and don't really care to go over and confirm. I really think it's her. I don't think she was vying for a seat when she wrote that, just she needed to get back.

Justus, much like the person that runs Jodi's twitter, posts as someone who is right there everyday, with an inside track in the courtroom. They have information that only someone with a direct line to Jodi would have, as any other supporter would not be able to communicate with her that often. There's been no mention of a supporter of hers that's been in attendance everyday.

And then theres this:

"Jodi will be speaking to the jury today..."

Who else but MDLR a would have known that?

Anyone she chooses to 'leak' through.

M.B. Kiefer, for that matter.

I also don't believe that MDLR admins JA's "Update" Twitter site.

But we're all just guessing.

 

[tlckgram]

Is anybody aware of whether or not accomodations for JA mother are paid by the state defense fund? As an expense R/T the DT needing her there to portray support for the killer during the trial? I have wondered that for quite awhile as the trial dragged on and on as I got the impression they aren't a well-off family.

 

[MeeBee]

Anyone she chooses to 'leak' through.

M.B. Kiefer, for that matter.

I also don't believe that MDLR admins JA's "Update" Twitter site.

But we're all just guessing.

Perhaps.

But I definitely think she does the Jodi Ann twitter. That one I think is more solid. She passes a note, minutes later, ther a a tweet. Again, of info only someone who speaks with her would know. They say Jodi isn't tweeting just to save face but they are CLEARLY her words and they have found a system that can get her words out quickly. It's gotta be someone who she can speak to directly who she's telling to tweet these things because they happen so instantaneously. And they happen even while court is ongoing which makes it highly likely it is her. Pass note. Tweet. Pass note. Tweet. Pass note. Tweet.

And MDLR has obviously taken a leading role in managing her funds and her art "business." At this point she's working as more of a manager/liaison. Why not her tweets, too?

 

[GigiG]

I am so behind here but I agree wholeheartedly with this. I also have many questions about their "relationship" as well. Soemthing is very off about him.

He also does that weird lizard tongue thing, just like JA. I wonder if one of them pick it up from the other?

 

[izzy1970]

Justus Forusall on Facebook is a community page. It may have multiple administrators, though I doubt she is one.

MDLR projects herself as a celebrity. If there's a picture/avatar her face and, er, assets are going to be in it.

MDLR enjoys her own likeness. Scales are not 'Cha-Cha' enough for her.

Moreover, as the mitigation specialist, she doesn't have to vie for a seat in the courtroom. She's allowed to be within sweet-nothings whispering distance of the murderess.

Thus, it would make little sense for her to think that, like the public, she might not get a seat if she doesn't hurry back into the courtroom.

Ergo, I maintain that she is not Justus Forusall and therefore did not post this:

View attachment 68944

I wonder if the person behind this writing you posted could be Jodi's mom or even her aunt... They had insider info knowing she would be talking to the jury and also knew they would be kicked out once the killer took the stand.

 

[MeeBee]

I wonder if the person behind this writing you posted could be Jodi's mom or even her aunt... They had insider info knowing she would be talking to the jury and also knew they would be kicked out once the killer took the stand.

Good point about knowing they'd be kicked out. Could be Aunt Sue, who's also been a vocal (and mean spirited towards the Alexanders) supporter.