Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Day 25

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Wild About Trial ‏@WildAboutTrial · 15m15 minutes ago
We are in a sizzle. Please tell a friend or two about us and have them follow our twitter please. I will be your best friend! #JodiArias
-----

Someone should tell WAT I (and probably others) will Follow him again if he has someone else do the afternoon tweeting, or he requires KS to act like a reporter covering a trial rather than a teenybopper at a twitter party.
 
MaryEllen Resendez @maryellenabc15 · 13s 14 seconds ago
Turn out #JodiArias def atty Jennifer Wilmott was also a speaker at Dr. Geffner's 9/2014 event -- All atty's now at judge's bench.

Grrrr, what was the ruling on this??? This is really freaking huge.

I'm starting to feel there will be hella lot of truth to JAs "ineffective counsel" appeal.
 
Alyce is not a dr.

Hi ILTBP. Yep that is a fact but trial by tweet is prone to confusion and inaccurate reporting (i.e., it appears MK is reporting one of the secret psych's as ALV), so for me this just gives some solid proof that it is not ALV--which also means to me that JA told several Psych's, not just ALV, a different story before changing it to match the NZ nutter.
 
I think it has been proven time and time again that none of these "experts" have been giving "independent" opinions and that they are all known to each other on at least a professional level and they are all there on the same agenda.

Problem is, this is a new jury. Will they get it? They don't even know about ALV do they?

MOO

Yes. New jury and sadly enough, experts that have had time to get their stories straight after the first trial.
 
Doing some catching up and just wanted to reply on something from past thread:

From tandt
Is there a theory of why MM is dead-set on smearing Travis w all these lies? Did they have a falling out, was/is MM in love


This is a good question and I wonder if JA was complaining about Travis to MM and beginning to share her dirty laundry with MM. I suspect it was JA who drug MM onto her side and her twisted view of things. This could explain why MM began to get hatred of Travis and ultimately Juan.
I think MM was suckered in by JA.

How would this be? TA's dealings with MM were years before he met JA and in another state. And JA would have been already arrested and in jail for quite some time before MM stuck his nose into this. No...someone from her supporter site has been the go between to get his info to JA and for her to go all out in a quest to use it IMO.



MOO
 
Isnt this her "minions" speaking for her and not really JA herself?

I think sometimes JA manages to pass info directly to them but most of the time I think her minions do her talking for her. Not sure who specifically she has to work for her like this.

Well obviously SHE isn't tweeting. I had previously thought that she was directing what to say on that twitter account. I have no idea who is tweeting for the twit but it's someone that is in the court IMO, because they are tweeting real time happenings. This is the first time I have seen this, although it may have happened in the past. Someone commented "Cha Cha get off twitter and do some real work" so some suspect it may be her tweeting. It definitely is one of her minions, but who?
 
How can she being doing this while she is court? I don't think she is the one tweeting this.


:seeya:

JMO but I think JA writes those Tweets down and gives it to her "mitigation specialist" ...

Then, the "mit spec" either posts them, or she passes the notes to JA's momma who is in court everyday ...

Maybe, momma posts them, or hands them off to someone else to post under JA's "name" ...

:waitasec: I hope that made sense !

Anyway ... this should NOT be allowed :gaah:
 
I think I was the one that posted the info about the conference the first time. The topic they were all discussing had to do with testifying about DV in court (I don't remember whether it was DV specifically or "abuse" more generally). I found the info on someone's CV.
 
And this judge ALWAYS calls for a break right in the middle of questioning when the person on the stand is befuddled...why oh why does she do this??? Let it go on!

This is so so true. Like the passing of time is going to settle the issue or something. It is so frustrating that she does this. Let it get resolved and then take a break. Instead, we come back from break and have to take 10 minutes or more just to figure out where the battle lines are. :)
 
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 30s 31 seconds ago
Geff says he wasn't given that info and it's not an interaction between TA and Jodi #jodiarias #3tvarias

No, it was stalking!

Well that's interesting. He sure wasn't using "that wasn't between TA and JA" excuse when Jenny was asking the questions!
 
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 30s 31 seconds ago
Geff says he wasn't given that info and it's not an interaction between TA and Jodi #jodiarias #3tvarias

No, it was stalking!

Unbelievable. This is Dr. F all over again; only reviewing things that make TA look back and ignoring everything JA did or say.
 
How can she being doing this while she is court? I don't think she is the one tweeting this.

No, its Donovan, and some think MDLR

Carolyn Sung ‏@CarolynSungCNN 3m3 minutes ago
Correction: #jodiarias is wearing a Brown, sleeveless shirt. She also passed a piece of paper to Maria.

The next tweet ready to go?
 
Well obviously SHE isn't tweeting. I had previously thought that she was directing what to say on that twitter account. I have no idea who is tweeting for the twit but it's someone that is in the court IMO, because they are tweeting real time happenings. This is the first time I have seen this, although it may have happened in the past. Someone commented "Cha Cha get off twitter and do some real work" so some suspect it may be her tweeting. It definitely is one of her minions, but who?

I think it is Cha Cha. It actually falls under her job description in a weird way. Mitigation Specialists are in charge of PR. And we know she loves Social Media.
 
Juan asks about Aug 2007- he says no where is it indicated that Jodi was at TA's house peeping in his windows, why not? #jodiarias #3tvarias

but she called her daddy and was crying about



Geff says he wasn't given that info and it's not an interaction between TA and Jodi #jodiarias #3tvarias

didn't Jodi confront him about it the next day?

BBM
According to a juror question and her response, yup...she confronted him.

Juror Question
46) Why did you confront Travis, after seeing him with another woman through his backyard window, if it was not due to jealousy?

A: I felt like he had been making an effort, um, this was right after he had, um, we had just slept together consensually, we went all the way, and he said "I love you" and all these things, so I felt like we were getting back together, and when I saw that, it seemed in contrast to what he had been telling me for a month, month and a half. My intention was to go there...

Objection (prosecution) Not answering the question, she was asked why she confronted him.

Jodi "I'm explaining why I went over there"
Judge "You may continue"
A: My intention was to go there to find out where we stood. Did he still want to try this, did he have any girlfriends, if he had a girlfriend that was fine, I just wanted to know, is all.
 
This is so so true. Like the passing of time is going to settle the issue or something. It is so frustrating that she does this. Let it get resolved and then take a break. Instead, we come back from break and have to take 10 minutes or more just to figure out where the battle lines are. :)

My complaint also is it gives the DT a chance to talk to the good doctor(ha) and refresh his memory.
 
And this judge ALWAYS calls for a break right in the middle of questioning when the person on the stand is befuddled...why oh why does she do this??? Let it go on!

Maybe the judge needs a smoke break...things get a wee bit tense in the court room..:floorlaugh:
 
If any of you were confused by all the tweets yesterday and want to understand just how JM was able to dissect lie after lie by witness #1, Marc McGee, go the the sidebar thread. Yes or No posted last night an article by court observer, Paul Sanders. Paul was on the Marrissa DeVault jury and he is at this trial every day. He has a blow by blow account of how masterfully Juan discredited witness number one and Jodi and the defense. Excellent read.

,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
148
Guests online
3,222
Total visitors
3,370

Forum statistics

Threads
602,775
Messages
18,146,832
Members
231,532
Latest member
StacyStacyStacy
Back
Top